[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a07863-ffcf-7740-ac87-8669a04f06b8":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a07863-da34-7109-a69e-dcc4f425ced7":300},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":299},"01a07863-ffcf-7740-ac87-8669a04f06b8","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a07863-da34-7109-a69e-dcc4f425ced7","Designing double voice and viewpoint shifts","Read each Korean passage and choose the continuation or interpretation that most clearly creates the requested viewpoint effect.","이중 목소리와 시점 전환 설계하기","가장 빠를 터였다는 인물의 믿음을 뒤 문장이 확인하거나, 단번에 열리겠지라는 자신감을 아이러니로 뒤집듯 서술자와 인물의 이중 목소리를 섬세하게 설계해요. 소설 단락을 꼼꼼히 읽고 요청된 시점 효과를 가장 분명하게 만드는 후속 문장이나 해석을 빈칸마다 골라 넣어요.",1,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223,242,261,280],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a07863-ffcf-79f0-ac87-8669a2ec472b","Mina chose a shortcut and believed “이 길이 가장 빠를 터였다.” The group arrived on time. Which later sentence confirms that first prediction while exposing the limit of her broader confidence? __1__",0,"Arriving on time confirms the immediate prediction. The correct continuation adds the later bridge closure, limiting only the broader confidence in the route; every option remains unattributed narration.","예측이 당장은 맞아도 뒤의 결과가 그 판단의 한계를 드러낼 수 있다.",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":10,"options":22},"01a07863-ffcf-799c-ac87-8669a21b3b8e",[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-78fc-ac87-8669a07e8387","일행은 제시간에 도착했지만, 돌아갈 때는 폐쇄된 다리 앞에서 되돌아섰다",true,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-793c-ac87-8669a15b2f2f","일행은 제시간에 도착했고, 돌아갈 때도 같은 길로 무사히 빠져나왔다",false,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7964-ac87-8669a1bb3be4","일행은 제시간에 도착했지만, 미나는 지도를 다시 확인하지 않았다",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a07863-ffcf-7ae8-ac87-8669a5aafc32","Read “태석은 낡은 열쇠를 치켜들었다. 이 문쯤이야 단번에 열리겠지.” Which continuation turns his confidence into irony? __1__","The key breaks the old key, so the event itself makes Taeseok’s confidence ironic. The rivals either confirm him or report an unrelated action.","큰소리친 직후의 실패는 앞선 자신감을 아이러니하게 만들 수 있다.",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":10,"options":43},"01a07863-ffcf-7aac-ac87-8669a58de5e1",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7a44-ac87-8669a30babdb","세 번째로 열쇠를 돌리자 잠금장치가 부드럽게 열렸다",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7a6c-ac87-8669a3ee319a","세 번째로 열쇠를 돌리자 문밖에서 관리인이 다가왔다",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7a8c-ac87-8669a4cfb160","세 번째로 열쇠를 돌리자 낡은 쇠붙이가 손안에서 부러졌다",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a07863-ffcf-7bcc-ac87-8669a8818733","The first paragraph says, “수아는 큐레이터를 보았다. 저 가벼운 사람이 작품의 무게를 알까.” Which next-paragraph sentence creates a clash between the two focal characters? __1__","The curator must first be established as the new perceiver and then evaluate Sua in that character’s own idiom. Repeating Sua’s judgment or summarizing both views from outside creates no reciprocal double voice.","한 사람의 침묵을 한 인물은 오만함으로, 다른 인물은 두려움으로 읽을 수 있다.",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":10,"options":61},"01a07863-ffcf-7b90-ac87-8669a86bbd89",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7b30-ac87-8669a690451c","큐레이터는 창밖의 수아를 보았다. 저 성급한 평론가는 또 결론부터 내리는군",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7b50-ac87-8669a710941c","수아는 큐레이터가 가볍다고 다시 생각했다",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7b74-ac87-8669a770038d","두 사람은 서로를 오해하고 있었다",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a07863-ffcf-7ca8-ac87-8669ab2b5762","Hyeonu finds an empty parcel box. The lock is intact, but a neighbor saw someone in a management-office vest remove it. Which continuation preserves the uncertainty created by this conflicting evidence? __1__",3,"The missing collection record leaves both theft and authorized collection open. Either categorical rival closes the tension before the evidence warrants it.","부분적인 반대 증거는 처음 판단의 확실성만 낮춘 채 긴장을 이어 갈 수 있다.",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":10,"options":80},"01a07863-ffcf-7c70-ac87-8669aa2eefb8",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7c10-ac87-8669a915043a","도난 신고가 접수됐으니 절도가 확실했다",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7c34-ac87-8669a9aeee6d","이웃이 봤으니 정식 수거가 분명했다",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7c54-ac87-8669a9e213df","수거 기록은 아직 도착하지 않았다. 훔친 것일까, 허가된 수거였을까",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a07863-ffcf-7d94-ac87-8669ae7ba024","Read “예나는 잠긴 서랍을 보았다. 결국 그 비겁한 동료가 증거를 숨긴 것이다.” Without quotation or an explicit thought\u002Freport frame, which continuation first supports and then overturns that suspicion? __1__",4,"The first clause initially supports Yena’s suspicion, but the complete email record identifies the archivist as the actor. The rivals use explicit 생각했다 or quotation frames and therefore fail the stated criterion.","처음에는 인물의 판단을 믿게 한 뒤 더 온전한 기록으로 그 판단을 뒤집을 수 있다.",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":10,"options":99},"01a07863-ffcf-7d4c-ac87-8669adf855b9",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7cec-ac87-8669abfc1fe8","앞부분만 보면 동료가 잠근 듯했지만, 전체 메일에는 기록관이 잠갔다고 적혀 있었다",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7d10-ac87-8669ac4fb55e","예나는 처음에는 동료인 줄 알았지만 전체 메일을 보고 기록관의 일이라고 생각했다",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7d30-ac87-8669ad4897e7","“처음에는 동료인 줄 알았지만 기록관이 잠갔네”라고 예나는 말했다",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a07863-ffcf-7e70-ac87-8669b1365d2f","The focal character calls the neighbors “저 탐욕스러운 인간들.” Without an explicit thought or speech frame, which continuation makes the work distance itself from that prejudice? __1__",5,"The ledger’s record of the neighbors paying his overdue fees supplies counterevidence, keeping the insult attributable to the character without endorsing it. The rivals either support the prejudice or give irrelevant background.","뒤의 반대 증거나 다른 목소리는 인물의 모욕적 명명과 서술 사이에 비판적 거리를 만들 수 있다.",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":10,"options":118},"01a07863-ffcf-7e38-ac87-8669b0fca77f",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7dd8-ac87-8669af74073e","장부에는 이웃들의 체납 내역만 빼곡히 적혀 있었다",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7df8-ac87-8669b002dec7","그러나 장부에는 이웃들이 그의 밀린 관리비까지 대신 낸 기록이 있었다",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7e1c-ac87-8669b0b01ebd","장부는 낡은 서랍 안에 몇 달째 보관되어 있었다",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a07863-ffcf-7f48-ac87-8669b3326682","After “현서는 문손잡이를 놓았다,” which continuation keeps third-person narration while entering Hyeonseo’s free indirect voice? __1__",6,"자기만 and the rhetorical -한단 말인가 reproduce Hyeonseo’s immediate complaint. The rivals only report a signature state or an external action.","현서는 오래된 신청서를 볼 수밖에 없었다. 자기만 이 억지스러운 해명을 끝까지 읽어야 하는 모양이었다.",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":10,"options":137},"01a07863-ffcf-7f14-ac87-8669b2f7f5d5",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7eb4-ac87-8669b211764f","요청서에는 현서의 서명만 빠져 있었다",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffcf-7ed4-ac87-8669b22a7a6f","현서는 거절 통보서를 책상 위에 놓았다",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffcf-7ef4-ac87-8669b2cd4cab","또 자기만 요청을 거절해야 한단 말인가",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a07863-ffd0-708d-9819-2ab45d20edb9","After “지수는 빗소리를 들으며 창가에 섰다,” which continuation creates free indirect discourse rather than nonlinear association or explicit thought report? __1__",7,"또 비라니 and 그 지긋지긋한 우산 convey Jisu’s evaluative voice. The rivals remain external descriptions of sound or action.","민수는 흐려진 하늘을 보았다. 또 소나기라니. 오늘도 운동장은 글렀군.",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":10,"options":156},"01a07863-ffd0-7055-9819-2ab45cd8e469",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffcf-7f8c-ac87-8669b3cfb1b9","빗소리는 점점 거세어졌고 창문이 낮게 울렸다",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-700d-9819-2ab45b5a68b6","지수는 우산을 챙겨 현관으로 걸어갔다",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-7035-9819-2ab45bf147c7","또 비라니. 오늘도 그 지긋지긋한 우산을 들고 나가야 했다",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a07863-ffd0-7165-9819-2ab460da38a2","On Friday night, Dasol waits on the platform for a Saturday train. Which sentence preserves Dasol’s time and place center within past-tense narration? __1__",8,"내일 and 여기 are anchored to Dasol on the Friday-night platform, while -을 터였다 aligns with the surrounding past-tense narration.","장면 속 인물의 오늘·내일·여기는 서술자의 달력이나 위치와 다를 수 있다.",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":10,"options":175},"01a07863-ffd0-712d-9819-2ab45fe040e8",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-70d1-9819-2ab45e0d7b7e","다음 날이면 그 승강장에서 마지막 열차를 탈 예정이었다",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-70f1-9819-2ab45ea2eac1","내일이면 여기서 마지막 열차를 탈 터였다",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-7111-9819-2ab45f63cb45","토요일에는 그곳에서 마지막 열차가 출발할 예정이었다",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a07863-ffd0-7249-9819-2ab4638860cb","Which sentence most clearly establishes Yuna as the focal character before a new scene enters her consciousness? __1__",9,"Yuna’s name plus her tactile perception establishes the focal character before an unattributed question or evaluation. The rivals merely supply external facts.","민재는 문틈으로 새어 나오는 빛을 바라보았다.",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":10,"options":194},"01a07863-ffd0-7211-9819-2ab46302d90a",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-71a9-9819-2ab46133025f","복도 끝에서 누군가 봉투를 떨어뜨렸다",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-71d5-9819-2ab4622509d4","유나는 봉투가 무거울 것이라고 생각했다",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-71f5-9819-2ab4624df07f","유나는 떨리는 손으로 봉투를 다시 만져 보았다",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a07863-ffd0-7321-9819-2ab4654d52d8","Yuna is already the focal character. Which next sentence uses private memory to strengthen attribution to her viewpoint? __1__",10,"The private name 파란 문 comes from a memory shared only by Yuna and her father, so it supplies character-restricted knowledge rather than general background.","그가 어린 시절 ‘별 계단’이라 부르던 곳이었다.",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":10,"options":213},"01a07863-ffd0-72ed-9819-2ab4650bdba5",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-728d-9819-2ab464099c9a","관리인이 늘 ‘동쪽 문’이라 부르던 바로 그 입구였다",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-72ad-9819-2ab4646541c3","아버지가 늘 ‘파란 문’이라 부르던 바로 그 입구였다",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-72cd-9819-2ab46503a1f5","안내판에 늘 ‘주 출입구’라 표시되던 바로 그 입구였다",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a07863-ffd0-73f9-9819-2ab467b683fb","After the focal character and private memory are established, which sentence most clearly intensifies Yuna’s voice without switching to direct or ordinary indirect discourse? __1__",11,"설마 and the rhetorical -겠지 convey Yuna’s anxious conjecture, while no quotation marks or thought verb interrupt the narrative frame.","도대체 왜 또 자기만 기다려야 한단 말인가.",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":10,"options":232},"01a07863-ffd0-73c5-9819-2ab4672c546c",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-7369-9819-2ab4662e904e","상대는 그 약속까지 잊은 듯했다",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-7389-9819-2ab46690daae","설마 그 약속까지 잊은 건 아니겠지",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-73a5-9819-2ab466f8e291","유나는 그가 약속을 잊었는지 궁금해했다",{"id":243,"sentenceTemplate":244,"displayOrder":245,"explanation":246,"exampleSentence":247,"blanks":248},"01a07863-ffd0-74fd-9819-2ab469ad1a9b","After a paragraph break, which sentence moves from Yuna’s free indirect discourse into Minsu’s consciousness without blurring the voices? __1__",12,"Minsu’s name and visual action establish him as the new focal character after the paragraph boundary. An ambient event or an external fact about his document does not establish his consciousness.","빈 줄 뒤에 “서진은 창밖의 발소리를 들었다”를 놓을 수 있다.",[249],{"id":250,"blankNumber":10,"options":251},"01a07863-ffd0-74bd-9819-2ab468f63c49",[252,255,258],{"id":253,"optionText":254,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-743d-9819-2ab4689b57ec","민수의 보고서는 책상 위에 놓여 있었다",{"id":256,"optionText":257,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-7461-9819-2ab468b6d06b","복도 끝에서 발소리가 들려왔다",{"id":259,"optionText":260,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-747d-9819-2ab468cf5ebf","민수는 창가에 멈춰 희미한 발자국을 바라보았다",{"id":262,"sentenceTemplate":263,"displayOrder":264,"explanation":265,"exampleSentence":266,"blanks":267},"01a07863-ffd0-75e1-9819-2ab46c481b32","After Yuna’s anxious rhetorical question, which sentence most clearly exits into externally observable narration? __1__",13,"The announcement and Yuna’s visible movement restore a scene open to any observer and break the inward rhetorical rhythm.","창문이 흔들렸고, 현서는 컵을 내려놓았다.",[268],{"id":269,"blankNumber":10,"options":270},"01a07863-ffd0-75a9-9819-2ab46b840310",[271,274,277],{"id":272,"optionText":273,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-7541-9819-2ab46a6391c8","정말 자신이 모두 잘못한 것일까",{"id":275,"optionText":276,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-7561-9819-2ab46acb3475","그 비겁한 사람은 끝내 나타나지 않겠지",{"id":278,"optionText":279,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-758d-9819-2ab46ad3a535","복도 스피커가 울렸고, 유나는 편지를 접어 자리에서 일어났다",{"id":281,"sentenceTemplate":282,"displayOrder":283,"explanation":284,"exampleSentence":285,"blanks":286},"01a07863-ffd0-76b5-9819-2ab46f2b5040","After “재호는 면담실의 빈 의자를 보았다,” which declarative continuation conveys Jaeho’s weary resignation and hostile evaluation without a rhetorical question? __1__",14,"자기만 and 이 뻔한 변명 carry Jaeho’s resignation and judgment inside a past-tense declarative. The rivals give only external information about scheduling or the explanation.","서윤은 빈 서류철을 보았다. 자기만 이 엉성한 기록을 다시 정리해야 하는 모양이었다.",[287],{"id":288,"blankNumber":10,"options":289},"01a07863-ffd0-767d-9819-2ab46e535baf",[290,293,296],{"id":291,"optionText":292,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07863-ffd0-7621-9819-2ab46d46a62b","재호만 변명을 듣도록 면담 순서가 정해져 있었다",{"id":294,"optionText":295,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07863-ffd0-7641-9819-2ab46d63eff2","자기만 이 뻔한 변명을 끝까지 들어야 하는 모양이었다",{"id":297,"optionText":298,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07863-ffd0-7661-9819-2ab46e356fdb","그 변명은 앞서 제출된 설명과 같은 내용이었다","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_ab960bfe-616e-42d5-a0db-ec7a8c774ecd_hero.webp?v=1788726214",{"title":301,"slug":302,"language":303,"level":304},"자유 간접 화법과 의식의 표현","jayu-ganjeop-hwabeop","ko","C2"]