[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a07864-00bf-7f86-83cd-4facfa80fbf0":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a07863-da4d-7c0e-aee9-47ad0c32ab41":331},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":330},"01a07864-00bf-7f86-83cd-4facfa80fbf0","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a07863-da4d-7c0e-aee9-47ad0c32ab41","Build chains of source and responsibility","Arrange the Korean word-group cards to match the stated evidence path. Items 1 and 3–5 use colloquial endings; items 2 and 6–12 use analytical 하다체. Each item has exactly two unused rivals.","출처와 책임의 연결 고리 문장 조립","서고를 직접 둘러본 회상, 기상청 예보에만 기댄 대설 전달처럼 정보가 어디서 왔는지와 화자의 책임 범위가 드러나는 문장을 직접 만들어요. 영어로 제시된 증거 경로에 맞춰 한국어 어절 카드를 차례로 배열하며 구어체와 보고서체 어미를 구별해 문장을 정확히 완성해요.",0,"sentence_builder",[13,41,66,92,118,146,172,198,223,249,276,303],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":16,"exampleSentence":17,"blanks":18},"01a07864-00c0-7246-b4ca-4bce36c36f00","Begin with 서고를. Build a colloquial report in which the speaker personally inspected the archive and recalls seeing it empty: __1__","서고를 직접 살펴보니 marks direct inspection, and 비어 있더라 recalls the state seen then. 들어보니 and 비었대 would switch the path to hearsay.","현장을 살핀 결과, 출입문이 잠겨 있더라.",[19],{"id":20,"blankNumber":21,"options":22,"tiles":35},"01a07864-00c0-71f2-b4ca-4bce3648ab48",1,[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-715a-b4ca-4bce33bd615f","서고를 직접 살펴보니 비어 있더라.",true,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-719a-b4ca-4bce34bb615b","들어보니",false,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-71ca-b4ca-4bce3589909c","비었대",2,[36,37,38,39,40],"서고를","직접","살펴보니","비어","있더라.",{"id":42,"sentenceTemplate":43,"displayOrder":21,"explanation":44,"exampleSentence":45,"blanks":46},"01a07864-00c0-733e-b4ca-4bce39a71319","Build a report-style sentence that attributes the heavy-snow forecast only to an official Korea Meteorological Administration document: __1__","기상청의 공식 발표 fixes a traceable documentary source, while 내용이었다 reports its content without adding hearsay or a present inference about the document.","위원회의 공지는 심사 일정이 바뀐다는 내용이었다.",[47],{"id":48,"blankNumber":21,"options":49,"tiles":59},"01a07864-00c0-7302-b4ca-4bce391d37f4",[50,53,56],{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-729a-b4ca-4bce36f7fdeb","내용이었대.",{"id":54,"optionText":55,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-72c2-b4ca-4bce37c025b5","내린다고는",{"id":57,"optionText":58,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-72e2-b4ca-4bce38886cb2","기상청의 공식 발표는 폭설이 내린다는 내용이었다.",[60,61,62,63,64,65],"기상청의","공식","발표는","폭설이","내린다는","내용이었다.",{"id":67,"sentenceTemplate":68,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":69,"exampleSentence":70,"blanks":71},"01a07864-00c0-7426-b4ca-4bce3cdd7ca7","Build a colloquial sentence that cites a neighboring department’s staff member and relays an earlier-heard review result with -다더라: __1__","옆 부서 담당자 말로는 names the source, and 발표됐다더라 recalls and relays the earlier report. 발표됐대 gives immediate colloquial hearsay, while 발표됐더라 presents recollection of personally accessed evidence.","인사팀 말로는 새 지침이 다음 달부터 시행된다더라.",[72],{"id":73,"blankNumber":21,"options":74,"tiles":84},"01a07864-00c0-73ee-b4ca-4bce3bed9aef",[75,78,81],{"id":76,"optionText":77,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-738a-b4ca-4bce3a55a726","발표됐대.",{"id":79,"optionText":80,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-73ae-b4ca-4bce3ae6c2b1","발표됐더라.",{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-73ce-b4ca-4bce3b068df2","옆 부서 담당자 말로는 심사 결과가 발표됐다더라.",[85,86,87,88,89,90,91],"옆","부서","담당자","말로는","심사","결과가","발표됐다더라.",{"id":93,"sentenceTemplate":94,"displayOrder":95,"explanation":96,"exampleSentence":97,"blanks":98},"01a07864-00c0-753a-b4ca-4bce3e9c0cf6","Build a colloquial sentence that relays an operations committee member’s explicit declarative statement that next week’s schedule changed: __1__",3,"운영위원에게 들으니 names the source, and 바뀌었대 relays the declarative content as colloquial hearsay. The rivals instead report a question or add conjecture.","연구소 책임자가 교체됐대.",[99],{"id":100,"blankNumber":21,"options":101,"tiles":111},"01a07864-00c0-74fe-b4ca-4bce3e31ed69",[102,105,108],{"id":103,"optionText":104,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-746a-b4ca-4bce3d921ee2","운영위원에게 들으니 다음 주 일정이 바뀌었대.",{"id":106,"optionText":107,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-748e-b4ca-4bce3df47f3e","바뀌었냬",{"id":109,"optionText":110,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-74ca-b4ca-4bce3e1c13b9","바뀌었겠지",[112,113,114,115,116,117],"운영위원에게","들으니","다음","주","일정이","바뀌었대.",{"id":119,"sentenceTemplate":120,"displayOrder":121,"explanation":122,"exampleSentence":123,"blanks":124},"01a07864-00c0-7612-b4ca-4bce4064f65c","Begin with 사무실 불이. Build a colloquial sentence that uses the currently dark office as evidence for an immediate inference that the staff have gone home: __1__",4,"불이 꺼진 걸 보니 supplies the observed clue, while 퇴근했나 보다 marks an immediate inference rather than recollection or hearsay. Omitting a free degree adverb leaves one intended evidence-to-inference order.","발자국이 이어진 걸 보니 누군가 먼저 들어갔나 보다.",[125],{"id":126,"blankNumber":21,"options":127,"tiles":137},"01a07864-00c0-75da-b4ca-4bce40189577",[128,131,134],{"id":129,"optionText":130,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-757e-b4ca-4bce3f767db2","퇴근했나며",{"id":132,"optionText":133,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-759e-b4ca-4bce3f9255d4","퇴근했대",{"id":135,"optionText":136,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-75be-b4ca-4bce3fe55c99","사무실 불이 꺼진 걸 보니 직원들이 퇴근했나 보다.",[138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145],"사무실","불이","꺼진","걸","보니","직원들이","퇴근했나","보다.",{"id":147,"sentenceTemplate":148,"displayOrder":149,"explanation":150,"exampleSentence":151,"blanks":152},"01a07864-00c0-76ee-b4ca-4bce4411e777","Begin with 비가 온다는. Build an analytical sentence that separates the inferred rain from the visible wet umbrellas that support it: __1__",5,"The target identifies 비가 온다는 as the inferred proposition and 젖은 우산 as its observed evidence. The rival predicates would recast that analytical statement as hearsay or a fresh inference about the evidence itself.","“행사가 끝난 모양이다”라는 판단의 근거는 빈 회의실이었다.",[153],{"id":154,"blankNumber":21,"options":155,"tiles":165},"01a07864-00c0-76b6-b4ca-4bce4336abcc",[156,159,162],{"id":157,"optionText":158,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-7656-b4ca-4bce40821b5e","우산이었다더라",{"id":160,"optionText":161,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-7676-b4ca-4bce415e4965","우산이겠지.",{"id":163,"optionText":164,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-769a-b4ca-4bce425c6a93","비가 온다는 추론의 근거는 젖은 우산이었다.",[166,167,168,169,170,171],"비가","온다는","추론의","근거는","젖은","우산이었다.",{"id":173,"sentenceTemplate":174,"displayOrder":175,"explanation":176,"exampleSentence":177,"blanks":178},"01a07864-00c0-77ca-b4ca-4bce46570826","Begin with 해명이라는 명칭은. Build an analytical sentence showing that a reporter, not the original speaker, recategorized the statement as an explanation: __1__",6,"Naming the reporter’s evaluation as the source of the label shows that 해명 is the current reporter’s interpretation, not the original speaker’s self-description or a verified fact.","‘변명’이라는 명칭은 편집자의 판단이 개입한 결과였다.",[179],{"id":180,"blankNumber":21,"options":181,"tiles":191},"01a07864-00c0-7792-b4ca-4bce460f4732",[182,185,188],{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-7732-b4ca-4bce44d8281f","자칭이었다.",{"id":186,"optionText":187,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-7756-b4ca-4bce44de9f45","해명이라는 명칭은 기자의 평가가 개입한 결과였다.",{"id":189,"optionText":190,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-7776-b4ca-4bce45d02f2c","사실이었다.",[192,193,194,195,196,197],"해명이라는","명칭은","기자의","평가가","개입한","결과였다.",{"id":199,"sentenceTemplate":200,"displayOrder":201,"explanation":202,"exampleSentence":203,"blanks":204},"01a07864-00c0-78ae-b4ca-4bce49ad8f42","Begin with 대변인은. Build a sentence that places negation inside the reported proposition while keeping the reporting act affirmative: __1__",7,"In 취소되지 않았다고 말했다, negation belongs to the quoted proposition, while the spokesperson’s act of speaking remains affirmed.","담당자의 말은 “자료가 유출되지 않았다”는 것이었다.",[205],{"id":206,"blankNumber":21,"options":207,"tiles":217},"01a07864-00c0-786a-b4ca-4bce490c0393",[208,211,214],{"id":209,"optionText":210,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-780e-b4ca-4bce46fe5122","취소됐다고는",{"id":212,"optionText":213,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-782e-b4ca-4bce47c70c60","침묵했다",{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-784e-b4ca-4bce48302fd5","대변인은 행사가 취소되지 않았다고 말했다.",[218,219,220,221,222],"대변인은","행사가","취소되지","않았다고","말했다.",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a07864-00c0-798e-b4ca-4bce4c1c11e7","Begin with 기록에는. Build a sentence stating only that the minutes contain no cancellation announcement, without inferring that continuation was announced: __1__",8,"발표한 대목이 없었다 negates only the act of announcing cancellation; it does not license the opposite conclusion that continuation was announced.","녹취에는 담당자의 “자료 유출” 언급이 없었다.",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":21,"options":232,"tiles":242},"01a07864-00c0-7956-b4ca-4bce4bc6b1ba",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-78f6-b4ca-4bce4a37d0d8","열렸다고는",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-791a-b4ca-4bce4a86adda","기록에는 대변인이 행사가 취소됐다고 발표한 대목이 없었다.",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-793a-b4ca-4bce4afc7940","진행한다며",[243,244,219,245,246,247,248],"기록에는","대변인이","취소됐다고","발표한","대목이","없었다.",{"id":250,"sentenceTemplate":251,"displayOrder":252,"explanation":253,"exampleSentence":254,"blanks":255},"01a07864-00c0-7a66-b4ca-4bce4ed295cf","Begin with 보도국은. Build a two-layer source chain in which the newsroom relays a spokesperson’s announcement: __1__",9,"보도국은 is the outer relaying source, while 대변인 is the inner source who announced the minister’s future action. Replacing 전했다 with 목격했다 or 추론했다 would change the newsroom’s evidence path.","신문은 위원장이 일정이 늦어진다고 설명했다고 보도했다.",[256],{"id":257,"blankNumber":21,"options":258,"tiles":268},"01a07864-00c0-7a2e-b4ca-4bce4df7ba3f",[259,262,265],{"id":260,"optionText":261,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-79d2-b4ca-4bce4c9b6ddc","목격했다.",{"id":263,"optionText":264,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-79f2-b4ca-4bce4d1f404d","보도국은 대변인이 장관이 사퇴하지 않을 것이라고 발표했다고 전했다.",{"id":266,"optionText":267,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-7a12-b4ca-4bce4d2d24fa","추론했다.",[269,244,270,271,272,273,274,275],"보도국은","장관이","사퇴하지","않을","것이라고","발표했다고","전했다.",{"id":277,"sentenceTemplate":278,"displayOrder":279,"explanation":280,"exampleSentence":281,"blanks":282},"01a07864-00c0-7b42-b4ca-4bce50ee7310","Begin with 감사 보고서에 따르면. Build a sentence that gives a traceable source and leaves the conclusion explicitly unconfirmed: __1__",10,"The source phrase opens a verification path, while 확인되지 않았다 limits the current writer’s certainty. Omitting the mobile adverb leaves the source phrase and conclusion in one intended order.","위원회 기록에 따르면 해당 수치는 아직 재검증되지 않았다.",[283],{"id":284,"blankNumber":21,"options":285,"tiles":295},"01a07864-00c0-7b0a-b4ca-4bce505c4f65",[286,289,292],{"id":287,"optionText":288,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-7aaa-b4ca-4bce4ee8e279","확인되었다.",{"id":290,"optionText":291,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-7aca-b4ca-4bce4f2ee3b1","감사 보고서에 따르면 해당 결론은 확인되지 않았다.",{"id":293,"optionText":294,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-7aea-b4ca-4bce4fea1d09","입증되었다.",[296,297,298,299,300,301,302],"감사","보고서에","따르면","해당","결론은","확인되지","않았다.",{"id":304,"sentenceTemplate":305,"displayOrder":306,"explanation":307,"exampleSentence":308,"blanks":309},"01a07864-00c0-7c1a-b4ca-4bce527e39b1","Begin with 복수의 제보를 종합하면. Build an analytical sentence that presents a recurring schedule problem as known through converging reports, without claiming direct proof: __1__",11,"복수의 제보를 종합하면 makes the evidence path explicit, and -는 것으로 알려졌다 reports the converging information without turning it into direct proof or the writer’s own inference.","여러 인터뷰를 종합하면 같은 오류가 반복된 것으로 알려졌다.",[310],{"id":311,"blankNumber":21,"options":312,"tiles":322},"01a07864-00c0-7be2-b4ca-4bce5272c93b",[313,316,319],{"id":314,"optionText":315,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-00c0-7b82-b4ca-4bce51863bcf","바뀐다고는",{"id":317,"optionText":318,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a07864-00c0-7ba6-b4ca-4bce523dd670","복수의 제보를 종합하면 일정이 반복해서 바뀌는 것으로 알려졌다.",{"id":320,"optionText":321,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-00c0-7bc6-b4ca-4bce524d6c45","확정되었다.",[323,324,325,116,326,327,328,329],"복수의","제보를","종합하면","반복해서","바뀌는","것으로","알려졌다.","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_9655778b-7367-4168-bad4-50a63088bd17_hero.webp?v=1788726214",{"title":332,"slug":333,"language":334,"level":335},"전달 정보의 증거성과 화자 개입","jeondal-jeongbo-jeunggeoseong-hwaja-gaeip","ko","C2"]