[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a07864-14fe-7320-8ba7-675d348c442b":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a07863-dc44-7149-84b5-53b5327f06d0":345},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":344},"01a07864-14fe-7320-8ba7-675d348c442b","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a07863-dc44-7149-84b5-53b5327f06d0","반어의 문맥과 관계 조절하기","Choose the Korean question or response whose wording, evidence, genre, and relationship make the intended reading recoverable.","반어적 질문의 문맥과 관계 조절","표지와 한 문장뿐인 계획서에 던진 이게 완성된 계획서입니까?처럼 표현과 증거, 장르, 관계로 반어의 뜻이 드러나는 질문이나 응답을 골라요. 비판의 강도를 관계에 맞게 조절하는 한국어 표현을 익히며, 상사와 동료 앞에서 같은 반어가 주는 인상이 어떻게 다른지 비교해요.",1,"word_select",[13,39,60,81,102,124,146,168,190,212,234,256,278,300,322],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a07864-14fe-7620-8ba7-675d378950e8","The quarterly plan contains only a cover and one sentence. The team lead flips through it and asks, “고작 이게 __1__?”",0,"완성된 계획서입니까 uses the present nominal-predicate form to repeat and reject the visible label. The rivals ask about past status, reported wording, or the addressee’s knowledge.","고작 수치 하나로 위험 분석이 끝났다고 할 수 있습니까?",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":10,"options":22},"01a07864-14fe-75cc-8ba7-675d36c7fb88",[23,27,31,35],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7514-8ba7-675d34f4f65f","완성된 계획서입니까",true,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7558-8ba7-675d35759662","완성된 계획서였습니까",false,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7584-8ba7-675d359f5b84","완성된 계획서라고 합니까",2,{"id":36,"optionText":37,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-75a8-8ba7-675d360086f6","완성된 계획서인지 압니까",3,{"id":40,"sentenceTemplate":41,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":42,"exampleSentence":43,"blanks":44},"01a07864-14fe-7740-8ba7-675d3acaec3b","A memo submitted as a disaster-response plan contains neither evacuation routes nor responsible officers. The mayor asks, “설마 이 한 줄이 __1__?”","재난 대응책입니까 uses a present nominal-predicate question to repeat and reject the claimed status. The rivals change polarity, report the label, or ask about a past status.","설마 연락처도 없는 문서가 비상 지침입니까?",[45],{"id":46,"blankNumber":10,"options":47},"01a07864-14fe-7700-8ba7-675d3a669e99",[48,51,54,57],{"id":49,"optionText":50,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7678-8ba7-675d38513120","재난 대응책이 아닙니까",{"id":52,"optionText":53,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-769c-8ba7-675d38d1fdae","재난 대응책입니까",{"id":55,"optionText":56,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-76c0-8ba7-675d38f91e21","재난 대응책이라고 합니까",{"id":58,"optionText":59,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-76e0-8ba7-675d3969aed6","재난 대응책이었습니까",{"id":61,"sentenceTemplate":62,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":63,"exampleSentence":64,"blanks":65},"01a07864-14fe-784c-8ba7-675d3e36d808","After hearing an account with mutually contradictory figures, a reporter asks, “도대체 누가 이런 설명을 __1__?”","납득하겠습니까 expects no credible person to accept the contradictory account and expresses strong disbelief.","근거가 세 번 바뀐 해명을 누가 신뢰하겠습니까?",[66],{"id":67,"blankNumber":10,"options":68},"01a07864-14fe-7810-8ba7-675d3dd2bb20",[69,72,75,78],{"id":70,"optionText":71,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-778c-8ba7-675d3b836768","납득했습니까",{"id":73,"optionText":74,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-77b0-8ba7-675d3c2fe52e","납득했다고 합니까",{"id":76,"optionText":77,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-77d0-8ba7-675d3cb12e25","납득하겠습니까",{"id":79,"optionText":80,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-77f0-8ba7-675d3dafcf08","납득하지 않았습니까",{"id":82,"sentenceTemplate":83,"displayOrder":38,"explanation":84,"exampleSentence":85,"blanks":86},"01a07864-14fe-7968-8ba7-675d4203a351","A department labels a damage report that it ignored for a month as a case of rapid response. The auditor asks, “정말 이것이 시민을 위한 __1__?”","신속한 대응입니까 uses the present nominal-predicate form to repeat and reject the label. The rivals change polarity, report the label, or ask about a past status.","요청을 석 달 묵혀 둔 것이 적극적인 지원입니까?",[87],{"id":88,"blankNumber":10,"options":89},"01a07864-14fe-792c-8ba7-675d41c58662",[90,93,96,99],{"id":91,"optionText":92,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7898-8ba7-675d3ef8f103","신속한 대응이 아닙니까",{"id":94,"optionText":95,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-78bc-8ba7-675d3f8ab1ed","신속한 대응이라고 합니까",{"id":97,"optionText":98,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-78dc-8ba7-675d4026e854","신속한 대응이었습니까",{"id":100,"optionText":101,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7910-8ba7-675d40c98c98","신속한 대응입니까",{"id":103,"sentenceTemplate":104,"displayOrder":105,"explanation":106,"exampleSentence":107,"blanks":108},"01a07864-14fe-7a74-8ba7-675d4468a996","A research lead rejects a proposal to skip safety tests and asks, “그런 절차로 결과의 신뢰성을 __1__?”",4,"확보할 수 있겠습니까 is a present formal rhetorical possibility question conveying that reliability cannot be secured. The rivals ask about the past, quote a claim, or carry positive expectation.","대조군도 없이 인과관계를 입증할 수 있겠습니까?",[109],{"id":110,"blankNumber":10,"options":111},"01a07864-14fe-7a34-8ba7-675d4462facc",[112,115,118,121],{"id":113,"optionText":114,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-79b0-8ba7-675d424d03b1","확보할 수 있었습니까",{"id":116,"optionText":117,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-79d4-8ba7-675d42b6ca04","확보했다고 합니까",{"id":119,"optionText":120,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-79f4-8ba7-675d43600e04","확보되지 않겠습니까",{"id":122,"optionText":123,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7a14-8ba7-675d437192cb","확보할 수 있겠습니까",{"id":125,"sentenceTemplate":126,"displayOrder":127,"explanation":128,"exampleSentence":129,"blanks":130},"01a07864-14fe-7b78-8ba7-675d486165a0","A statistical table with its source removed is displayed at a meeting. The chair asks, “작성 기관도 모르는 수치를 누가 __1__?”",5,"근거로 삼겠습니까 expects nobody to treat an untraceable table as evidence.","조사 시점도 없는 비율을 누가 믿겠습니까?",[131],{"id":132,"blankNumber":10,"options":133},"01a07864-14fe-7b3c-8ba7-675d478ec0a7",[134,137,140,143],{"id":135,"optionText":136,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7abc-8ba7-675d45543bef","근거로 삼았습니까",{"id":138,"optionText":139,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7adc-8ba7-675d4603d464","근거로 삼겠습니까",{"id":141,"optionText":142,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7b00-8ba7-675d46c503cb","근거로 삼았다고 합니까",{"id":144,"optionText":145,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7b20-8ba7-675d47540997","근거로 삼지 않았습니까",{"id":147,"sentenceTemplate":148,"displayOrder":149,"explanation":150,"exampleSentence":151,"blanks":152},"01a07864-14fe-7c78-8ba7-675d4c2061db","An archivist rejects an order to destroy the only surviving record: “이 유일한 기록을 누가 함부로 __1__?”",6,"불태우겠는가 expects 아무도 and turns the question into a forceful rejection of destroying the record.","후대에 남길 원본을 누가 함부로 버리겠는가?",[153],{"id":154,"blankNumber":10,"options":155},"01a07864-14fe-7c3c-8ba7-675d4b503ef3",[156,159,162,165],{"id":157,"optionText":158,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7bc0-8ba7-675d48e81380","불태웠는가",{"id":160,"optionText":161,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7be0-8ba7-675d49844a5b","불태운다고 하는가",{"id":163,"optionText":164,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7c00-8ba7-675d4a46a3af","불태우겠는가",{"id":166,"optionText":167,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7c20-8ba7-675d4aae7f72","불태우지 않았는가",{"id":169,"sentenceTemplate":170,"displayOrder":171,"explanation":172,"exampleSentence":173,"blanks":174},"01a07864-14fe-7d94-8ba7-675d4fafcae4","At a design meeting, the cost table for two alternatives is still blank. The lead asks for an actual comparison: “두 안의 유지 비용은 각각 __1__?”",7,"얼마입니까 requests missing figures and keeps the answer open, so it is a genuine information question.","두 재료의 예상 수명은 각각 몇 년입니까?",[175],{"id":176,"blankNumber":10,"options":177},"01a07864-14fe-7d58-8ba7-675d4f04bd29",[178,181,184,187],{"id":179,"optionText":180,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7cc8-8ba7-675d4c26b8d1","고작 이 정도입니까",{"id":182,"optionText":183,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7cec-8ba7-675d4ca36188","설마 같겠습니까",{"id":185,"optionText":186,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7d0c-8ba7-675d4d131550","도대체 누가 믿겠습니까",{"id":188,"optionText":189,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7d34-8ba7-675d4e0d38e0","얼마입니까",{"id":191,"sentenceTemplate":192,"displayOrder":193,"explanation":194,"exampleSentence":195,"blanks":196},"01a07864-14fe-7e98-8ba7-675d53228f0e","A reviewer criticizes a prototype that has neither a lock nor a warning light: “잠금장치도 경고등도 없는데 정말 이대로 출시할 제품__1__?”",8,"입니까 completes a present nominal-predicate question whose listed safety omissions make the criticism explicit.","전원조차 켜지지 않는데 정말 점검 완료 제품입니까?",[197],{"id":198,"blankNumber":10,"options":199},"01a07864-14fe-7e5c-8ba7-675d52c94ad6",[200,203,206,209],{"id":201,"optionText":202,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7ddc-8ba7-675d504410f4","입니까",{"id":204,"optionText":205,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7e00-8ba7-675d50d627ac","이었습니까",{"id":207,"optionText":208,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7e20-8ba7-675d51c5298c","이라고 합니까",{"id":210,"optionText":211,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7e3c-8ba7-675d51f0e726","인지 압니까",{"id":213,"sentenceTemplate":214,"displayOrder":215,"explanation":216,"exampleSentence":217,"blanks":218},"01a07864-14ff-70c5-9d2a-1bf5de55037b","A policy report asks an open question and then analyzes income structure and transport access: “왜 같은 보조금이 지역마다 다른 효과를 __1__?”",9,"냈는가 completes a past discourse-organizing question that the following analysis is designed to answer.","어떤 조건이 참여율을 바꾸었는가? 이제 세 지역의 이동 시간을 비교한다.",[219],{"id":220,"blankNumber":10,"options":221},"01a07864-14ff-703d-9d2a-1bf5de074944",[222,225,228,231],{"id":223,"optionText":224,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14fe-7ee4-8ba7-675d53b36e21","냈는가",{"id":226,"optionText":227,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14fe-7f28-8ba7-675d548a24d4","냈겠는가",{"id":229,"optionText":230,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14fe-7f5c-8ba7-675d548c474e","내지 않겠는가",{"id":232,"optionText":233,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14fe-7f90-8ba7-675d54b293e9","냈다지요",{"id":235,"sentenceTemplate":236,"displayOrder":237,"explanation":238,"exampleSentence":239,"blanks":240},"01a07864-14ff-7235-9d2a-1bf5e0cd140e","A department head has already assigned weekend work and tells the most junior employee, “다들 바쁘니 이번 주말에도 나오는 편이 낫지 __1__?”",10,"않겠어요 appears indirect, but the superior’s prior decision and authority make refusal difficult and create pressure.","오늘 안에 끝내는 게 좋지 않겠습니까?",[241],{"id":242,"blankNumber":10,"options":243},"01a07864-14ff-71f5-9d2a-1bf5e0ae9a96",[244,247,250,253],{"id":245,"optionText":246,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14ff-7149-9d2a-1bf5de6bfd2b","않았어요",{"id":248,"optionText":249,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14ff-7179-9d2a-1bf5dedf3616","않았겠어요",{"id":251,"optionText":252,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14ff-719d-9d2a-1bf5df0a7ebe","않겠어요",{"id":254,"optionText":255,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14ff-71c5-9d2a-1bf5dfec292f","않는대요",{"id":257,"sentenceTemplate":258,"displayOrder":259,"explanation":260,"exampleSentence":261,"blanks":262},"01a07864-14ff-7345-9d2a-1bf5e3e80493","Replace a rhetorical certainty claim with the direct observed result from four independent experiments, not conjecture, inevitability, or hedging: “독립된 네 차례의 실험에서 같은 효과가 __1__.”",11,"관찰되었다 states the replication evidence and its scope directly. The declarative rivals add conjecture, inevitability, or unnecessary epistemic distance.","독립된 두 표본에서도 같은 방향의 효과가 관찰되었다.",[263],{"id":264,"blankNumber":10,"options":265},"01a07864-14ff-7309-9d2a-1bf5e3912d6f",[266,269,272,275],{"id":267,"optionText":268,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14ff-7281-9d2a-1bf5e11ee241","관찰되었을 것이다",{"id":270,"optionText":271,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14ff-72a5-9d2a-1bf5e175c25e","관찰될 수밖에 없다",{"id":273,"optionText":274,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14ff-72c9-9d2a-1bf5e2365369","관찰되었다고 볼 수 있다",{"id":276,"optionText":277,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14ff-72e9-9d2a-1bf5e318100f","관찰되었다",{"id":279,"sentenceTemplate":280,"displayOrder":281,"explanation":282,"exampleSentence":283,"blanks":284},"01a07864-14ff-7451-9d2a-1bf5e8332529","An advertisement asks “이 가격에 더 튼튼한 제품이 어디 있겠습니까?” but gives no comparison table. Complete the evidence-based response: “비교 자료가 없으므로 우월성 주장은 __1__.”",12,"검증되어야 한다 keeps the rhetorical superiority claim separate from evidence. The rivals incorrectly treat it as already proved or exempt from verification.","우월성을 암시하는 질문과 실제 성능 자료를 구별해야 한다.",[285],{"id":286,"blankNumber":10,"options":287},"01a07864-14ff-7415-9d2a-1bf5e796065c",[288,291,294,297],{"id":289,"optionText":290,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14ff-7391-9d2a-1bf5e4c2bfd1","이미 검증되었다",{"id":292,"optionText":293,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14ff-73b1-9d2a-1bf5e5b3ae13","검증될 필요가 없다",{"id":295,"optionText":296,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14ff-73d5-9d2a-1bf5e6a245ba","검증되었다고 볼 수 있다",{"id":298,"optionText":299,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14ff-73f5-9d2a-1bf5e70c1646","검증되어야 한다",{"id":301,"sentenceTemplate":302,"displayOrder":303,"explanation":304,"exampleSentence":305,"blanks":306},"01a07864-14ff-7571-9d2a-1bf5eafb07a2","Two totals in a colleague’s table differ from the source data. Complete the face-saving correction request: “두 합계가 원자료와 달라요. 함께 다시 __1__?”",13,"확인해 볼까요 identifies a shared next step without implying incompetence. The rivals turn the same form into retrospective or accusatory questioning.","세 번째 표의 합계가 원자료와 달라서 다시 확인해 주세요.",[307],{"id":308,"blankNumber":10,"options":309},"01a07864-14ff-7531-9d2a-1bf5ea82df63",[310,313,316,319],{"id":311,"optionText":312,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14ff-74ad-9d2a-1bf5e85c38fc","확인하지 않았어요",{"id":314,"optionText":315,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14ff-74d1-9d2a-1bf5e872760f","확인했다고 할 수 있어요",{"id":317,"optionText":318,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14ff-74f1-9d2a-1bf5e9639750","확인도 못 했어요",{"id":320,"optionText":321,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14ff-7511-9d2a-1bf5ea10ab80","확인해 볼까요",{"id":323,"sentenceTemplate":324,"displayOrder":325,"explanation":326,"exampleSentence":327,"blanks":328},"01a07864-14ff-7685-9d2a-1bf5eec5d2bd","At a public hearing, the chair protests “누가 의견을 내는 것을 막았습니까?” although nine of ten applicants run out of time before speaking. Complete the assessment: “제한이 없었다는 인상은 뒤의 사실로 __1__.”",14,"The rhetorical denial suggests that nobody obstructed participation, but the following participation fact directly contests that suggestion.","누가 참여를 제한했습니까? 실제 발언 시간은 두 분뿐이었습니다.",[329],{"id":330,"blankNumber":10,"options":331},"01a07864-14ff-7645-9d2a-1bf5ee79bffc",[332,335,338,341],{"id":333,"optionText":334,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-14ff-75b9-9d2a-1bf5ebd05cda","뒷받침된다",{"id":336,"optionText":337,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-14ff-75e9-9d2a-1bf5ecc1894e","확인된다",{"id":339,"optionText":340,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a07864-14ff-7609-9d2a-1bf5ed614576","반박된다",{"id":342,"optionText":343,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":38},"01a07864-14ff-7629-9d2a-1bf5edda2c02","강화된다","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_54d7cfed-e508-4b12-9c1b-26234dec382b_hero.webp?v=1788726220",{"title":346,"slug":347,"language":348,"level":349},"설의법과 반어적 질문","seoruibeop-gwa-baneojeok-jilmun","ko","C1"]