[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a07864-16c1-7c2a-a359-82fdba934ab4":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a07863-dc69-7a26-9a3b-aaffc3c91e21":310},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":309},"01a07864-16c1-7c2a-a359-82fdba934ab4","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a07863-dc69-7a26-9a3b-aaffc3c91e21","신조어의 문법적 통합과 사용 맥락","Choose the Korean form licensed by each sentence’s syntax, argument roles, and formal written register. The Korean target sentences use 한다체.","말뭉치 증거로 보는 신조어 통합과 사용","먹방이 유행했다, 먹방한다처럼 말뭉치에 기록된 용례를 명사와 동사 용법으로 나누어 분석하고, 한 번만 나온 -화 신조어의 생산성을 판단해요. 한다체 문어 문장의 구조와 논항에 맞는 형태를 고르며, 증거가 부족할 때 결론을 유보하는 신중한 서술도 익혀요.",2,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,88,107,126,157,176,195,214,233,252,271,290],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a07864-16c1-7ea2-a359-82fdbd6f4224","The corpus records 「먹방이 유행했다」, 「먹방을 본다」, 「먹방 콘텐츠」, and 「진행자가 먹방한다」. Which analysis assigns each piece of evidence to the right kind of grammatical extension? __1__",0,"The particles show that 「먹방」 occupies ordinary noun positions, its position before 「콘텐츠」 shows participation in a compound, and 「먹방한다」 separately attests verbal extension with 「-하다」.","조사 결합, 합성 참여, 용언화는 서로 관련되지만 각각 해당 분포의 실제 용례로 확인한다.",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":22,"options":23},"01a07864-16c1-7e52-a359-82fdbcdf66e8",1,[24,28,32],{"id":25,"optionText":26,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c1-7dba-a359-82fdbae78a07","먹방 콘텐츠만으로 조사 결합과 용언화가 모두 입증된다",false,{"id":29,"optionText":30,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c1-7dfa-a359-82fdbb8db297","조사 결합은 명사 분포, 먹방 콘텐츠는 합성 참여, 먹방한다는 용언화를 보여 준다",true,{"id":33,"optionText":34,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c1-7e2a-a359-82fdbc3249b3","먹방한다가 있으므로 먹방은 더 이상 명사로 쓰일 수 없다",{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":22,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a07864-16c1-7f9a-a359-82fdbff9b014","A dictionary lists many long-established words ending in 「-화」, but this year’s corpus contains only one playful coinage by one speaker. What is the most defensible productivity judgment? __1__","Dictionary entries attest established outputs of a pattern, whereas current productivity requires evidence that multiple speakers can apply it to new bases. One playful coinage is not enough to establish that capacity.","오래된 표제어의 수와 지금 새 단어를 만드는 힘은 서로 다른 지표다.",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":22,"options":43},"01a07864-16c1-7f62-a359-82fdbfbca761",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c1-7ef6-a359-82fdbe4eaefa","사전 표제어가 많으므로 현재 생산성도 자동으로 높다",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c1-7f1e-a359-82fdbeee46bb","한 번의 말장난만으로 여러 화자의 반복 적용이 입증된다",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c1-7f3e-a359-82fdbf6214da","기존 결과물은 확인되지만 현재 생산성은 독립적인 새 결합 자료가 더 필요하다",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a07864-16c2-70ff-9b68-b84b6a4f1f83","Complete the clause with 「연구팀」 as agent and 「측정 절차」 as object: “연구팀이 기관마다 달랐던 측정 절차를 하나의 기준으로 __1__.”","「표준화했다」 is transitive -화하다 and matches the explicit agent–object structure; the result and progressive rivals assign different roles or aspect.","편집위원회가 여러 기관의 표기 원칙을 하나로 통일했다.",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":22,"options":61},"01a07864-16c2-70c7-9b68-b84b6963d496",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7047-9b68-b84b68914cfe","표준화했다",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-7073-9b68-b84b68aad463","표준화되고 있었다",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-70a7-9b68-b84b691a3579","표준화되었다",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a07864-16c2-71e7-9b68-b84b6c0768ed","Complete the result clause licensed by the affected subject and completed-result context: “기관마다 달랐던 측정 절차가 공동 지침에 따라 하나의 형식으로 __1__.”",3,"The affected subject and completed common format require result-form 표준화되었다. 표준화하고 있었다 is a real progressive rival, while 표준화했다 would require an agentive subject.","지역마다 달랐던 분류 체계가 공동 기준에 따라 통일되었다.",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":22,"options":80},"01a07864-16c2-71ab-9b68-b84b6bb0de8d",[81,83,86],{"id":82,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7147-9b68-b84b6a781833",{"id":84,"optionText":85,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-716b-9b68-b84b6addd6f5","표준화하고 있었다",{"id":87,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-718b-9b68-b84b6b81d3a1",{"id":89,"sentenceTemplate":90,"displayOrder":91,"explanation":92,"exampleSentence":93,"blanks":94},"01a07864-16c2-72c7-9b68-b84b6ece4942","편집부가 초고를 허락 없이 인용했다. 피해 당사자인 필자의 말을 완성하세요. “나는 편집부에 내 초고를 허락 없이 __1__”라고 항의했다.",4,"The overt embedded subject 나는 is the affected person, 편집부에 identifies the outside agent, and 내 초고를 is the affected object, so 인용당했다 uniquely preserves the complaint reading.","저자는 “나는 방송사에 내 인터뷰를 맥락 없이 편집당했다”라고 항의했다.",[95],{"id":96,"blankNumber":22,"options":97},"01a07864-16c2-728f-9b68-b84b6ecdfa0d",[98,101,104],{"id":99,"optionText":100,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-722f-9b68-b84b6cf1d2fa","인용되었다",{"id":102,"optionText":103,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-724f-9b68-b84b6dbedef9","인용했다",{"id":105,"optionText":106,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-726f-9b68-b84b6e1b0b96","인용당했다",{"id":108,"sentenceTemplate":109,"displayOrder":110,"explanation":111,"exampleSentence":112,"blanks":113},"01a07864-16c2-73a7-9b68-b84b70eff5c4","In 「프로그램을 업데이트했다」, 「업데이트」 has its technical sense; in 「오랜만에 만난 친구에게 근황을 업데이트했다」, it refers to supplying recent personal news. Which analysis is most precise? __1__",5,"The second use metaphorically extends the idea of bringing information to a current state. The technical and everyday senses can coexist, so context—not the disappearance of the source sense—selects the interpretation.","기술 영역에서 출발한 표현이 일상 정보 교환으로 넓어져도 원래 뜻은 전문 문맥에 남을 수 있다.",[114],{"id":115,"blankNumber":22,"options":116},"01a07864-16c2-736f-9b68-b84b70a48ecb",[117,120,123],{"id":118,"optionText":119,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-730f-9b68-b84b6f296b0c","친구가 프로그램으로 바뀌었다는 뜻이다",{"id":121,"optionText":122,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-732f-9b68-b84b6fe3bc28","기술적 의미가 사라져 어떤 문맥에서도 쓸 수 없게 되었다",{"id":124,"optionText":125,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-734f-9b68-b84b7085c2e1","최신 상태로 만든다는 공통점을 바탕으로 일상적 의미가 비유적으로 확장되었다",{"id":127,"sentenceTemplate":128,"displayOrder":129,"explanation":130,"exampleSentence":131,"blanks":132},"01a07864-16c2-753f-9b68-b84b75baa49c","Complete the two contrasts from the Korean evidence: 「업데이트를 끝냈다는 기록대로 담당자가 낮에 프로그램을 직접 __1__, 야간에는 시스템 업데이트__2__ 다시 진행했다.」",6,"The completed-work record licenses active completed 「업데이트했고」 rather than an attempted or ongoing event. In the second clause, nominal 「시스템 업데이트」 is the object of 「진행했다」 and therefore takes 「를」.","‘자료를 복사했다’와 ‘자료 복사를 했다’는 모두 문법적이지만 조사 자리가 다르다.",[133,145],{"id":134,"blankNumber":22,"options":135},"01a07864-16c2-745b-9b68-b84b73402d2c",[136,139,142],{"id":137,"optionText":138,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-73ef-9b68-b84b711921c5","업데이트하려 했고",{"id":140,"optionText":141,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-740f-9b68-b84b720a50ef","업데이트했고",{"id":143,"optionText":144,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-742f-9b68-b84b727e607d","업데이트하고 있었고",{"id":146,"blankNumber":10,"options":147},"01a07864-16c2-7507-9b68-b84b7599bb34",[148,151,154],{"id":149,"optionText":150,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7493-9b68-b84b7388f8b2","가",{"id":152,"optionText":153,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-74c7-9b68-b84b73f6ea07","에",{"id":155,"optionText":156,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-74e7-9b68-b84b74ebf153","를",{"id":158,"sentenceTemplate":159,"displayOrder":160,"explanation":161,"exampleSentence":162,"blanks":163},"01a07864-16c2-763b-9b68-b84b787e3247","Complete the present-time report with the attributive 「-적」 form: 「오늘 공개된 설계는 현재 매우 __1__ 성격을 띤다.」",7,"「실험적인」 is the attributive 「-적」 form required directly before 「성격」. The adverbial and connective forms cannot occupy that modifier slot.","그 논문은 실험적인 분석 틀을 제안했다.",[164],{"id":165,"blankNumber":22,"options":166},"01a07864-16c2-7603-9b68-b84b77ccb842",[167,170,173],{"id":168,"optionText":169,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-759b-9b68-b84b7636f10d","실험적으로",{"id":171,"optionText":172,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-75bf-9b68-b84b768a2940","실험적이며",{"id":174,"optionText":175,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-75e3-9b68-b84b770ed530","실험적인",{"id":177,"sentenceTemplate":178,"displayOrder":179,"explanation":180,"exampleSentence":181,"blanks":182},"01a07864-16c2-771b-9b68-b84b7b1cea9d","Judge an inherent quality, not a change: 「평론가는 그 장식이 바뀐 것이 아니라 처음부터 __1__ 것이라고 평가했다.」",8,"「키치스러운」 characterises the decoration’s inherent quality. 「키치화된」 can grammatically fill this attributive slot, but it denotes a result produced by change and therefore conflicts semantically with 「바뀐 것이 아니라 처음부터」; 「키치스럽게」 is adverbial.","그 포스터는 일부러 키치스러운 색을 사용했다.",[183],{"id":184,"blankNumber":22,"options":185},"01a07864-16c2-76e3-9b68-b84b7aa3fa33",[186,189,192],{"id":187,"optionText":188,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7683-9b68-b84b7929dfc7","키치스럽게",{"id":190,"optionText":191,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-76a3-9b68-b84b799fc73a","키치화된",{"id":193,"optionText":194,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-76c3-9b68-b84b79d9bf4d","키치스러운",{"id":196,"sentenceTemplate":197,"displayOrder":198,"explanation":199,"exampleSentence":200,"blanks":201},"01a07864-16c2-77fb-9b68-b84b7ddb6c6e","Match each form to its formation method: 「개인적」, 「화상 회의」, 「라볶이」. __1__",9,"「개인적」 combines a base with the suffix 「-적」 and is derived; 「화상 회의」 combines two full nominal elements and is compound; 「라볶이」 combines parts of two source words and is a blend.","직접 결합한 요소가 접사인지, 온전한 어근인지, 단어의 일부인지에 따라 파생·합성·혼성을 구별한다.",[202],{"id":203,"blankNumber":22,"options":204},"01a07864-16c2-77c3-9b68-b84b7cf90ccc",[205,208,211],{"id":206,"optionText":207,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7763-9b68-b84b7b91dec8","개인적은 합성어, 화상 회의는 혼성어, 라볶이는 파생어다",{"id":209,"optionText":210,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-7787-9b68-b84b7c21b34b","개인적은 파생어, 화상 회의는 합성어, 라볶이는 혼성어다",{"id":212,"optionText":213,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-77a3-9b68-b84b7c772608","개인적은 혼성어, 화상 회의는 파생어, 라볶이는 축약어다",{"id":215,"sentenceTemplate":216,"displayOrder":217,"explanation":218,"exampleSentence":219,"blanks":220},"01a07864-16c2-78e3-9b68-b84b7ff30c99","Complete the self-contained result attributive: 「행사장에 먼저 들어간 사람은 입구에서 이미 __1__ 회원이었다.」",10,"「이미」 anchors completion inside the Korean sentence, so 「인증된」 is the result attributive modifying 「회원」. The process and prospective attributives conflict with that cue.","사전에 인증된 참가자만 전용 출입구를 이용했다.",[221],{"id":222,"blankNumber":22,"options":223},"01a07864-16c2-78af-9b68-b84b7fcb49c2",[224,227,230],{"id":225,"optionText":226,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-784b-9b68-b84b7ea36e32","인증하는",{"id":228,"optionText":229,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-786f-9b68-b84b7f3580ad","인증할",{"id":231,"optionText":232,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-788f-9b68-b84b7f35c329","인증된",{"id":234,"sentenceTemplate":235,"displayOrder":236,"explanation":237,"exampleSentence":238,"blanks":239},"01a07864-16c2-79cb-9b68-b84b8330ae11","Choose the 「-적」 form that functions adverbially before the predicate: “위원은 공동의 결론과 달리 조사 결과를 __1__ 해석했다.”",11,"「개인적으로」 is the adverbial 「-적」 form modifying 「해석했다」; the attributive and connective forms require different following structures.","같은 자료도 독자는 자신의 경험에 따라 개인적으로 해석할 수 있다.",[240],{"id":241,"blankNumber":22,"options":242},"01a07864-16c2-7993-9b68-b84b827ff1b7",[243,246,249],{"id":244,"optionText":245,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-792f-9b68-b84b80ecb3b3","개인적인",{"id":247,"optionText":248,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-794f-9b68-b84b8112ddbc","개인적이며",{"id":250,"optionText":251,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-7973-9b68-b84b81cf6b50","개인적으로",{"id":253,"sentenceTemplate":254,"displayOrder":255,"explanation":256,"exampleSentence":257,"blanks":258},"01a07864-16c2-7aa7-9b68-b84b85b3d84d","A newly coined noun takes a particle naturally in one campaign slogan, but no other speakers reuse it and its meaning changes from post to post. Which assessment keeps grammatical distribution separate from social establishment? __1__",12,"The particle-bearing example is evidence that the form can occupy a noun position in that sentence. A single slogan with unstable meaning does not establish durability, shared meaning, or adoption across a community.","문장 안의 결합 가능성과 공동체에서의 어휘 정착은 서로 다른 자료로 판단해야 한다.",[259],{"id":260,"blankNumber":22,"options":261},"01a07864-16c2-7a73-9b68-b84b84b82c75",[262,265,268],{"id":263,"optionText":264,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7a0f-9b68-b84b8344e24c","조사가 붙었으므로 널리 정착한 표준어임이 확정된다",{"id":266,"optionText":267,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-7a33-9b68-b84b842cfa86","뜻이 흔들리므로 그 문장에서도 명사 자리를 차지할 수 없다",{"id":269,"optionText":270,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-7a53-9b68-b84b84b58a12","그 문장의 명사적 분포는 관찰되지만 공동체 정착은 입증되지 않았다",{"id":272,"sentenceTemplate":273,"displayOrder":274,"explanation":275,"exampleSentence":276,"blanks":277},"01a07864-16c2-7b83-9b68-b84b8794d3a2","What does this sentence show about grammatical integration? “회원이 새 계정으로 서비스에 로그인했다.” __1__",13,"The loan noun 로그인 combines with -하다 and the past ending, demonstrating inflection as a Korean predicate rather than resistance to Korean grammar.","사용자가 외래 어기에 -하다를 붙여 ‘다운로드했다’로 활용했다.",[278],{"id":279,"blankNumber":22,"options":280},"01a07864-16c2-7b4f-9b68-b84b878a6790",[281,284,287],{"id":282,"optionText":283,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7aef-9b68-b84b8611d44a","차용어가 한국어 활용을 거부했다",{"id":285,"optionText":286,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-7b0f-9b68-b84b867d6643","차용 명사에 -하다와 시제 어미가 결합했다",{"id":288,"optionText":289,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-7b2f-9b68-b84b86dd4ec5","로그인이 조사 없이는 쓰일 수 없다",{"id":291,"sentenceTemplate":292,"displayOrder":293,"explanation":294,"exampleSentence":295,"blanks":296},"01a07864-16c2-7c6b-9b68-b84b8b39bbc8","Complete the full sentence with an appropriate register judgment: “공공 안내문에 특정 온라인 집단만 아는 새말을 쓰려면 __1__.”",14,"Public guidance must account for the full readership, so an in-group term needs a gloss or a more broadly understood replacement; attribution or online frequency alone does not secure comprehension.","전문 용어를 공공 자료에 쓸 때는 독자에게 필요한 풀이를 함께 제시한다.",[297],{"id":298,"blankNumber":22,"options":299},"01a07864-16c2-7c33-9b68-b84b8a4a13a9",[300,303,306],{"id":301,"optionText":302,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a07864-16c2-7bc7-9b68-b84b889070e2","첫 등장에 사용 집단만 밝히고 뜻풀이는 생략해도 된다",{"id":304,"optionText":305,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a07864-16c2-7bf3-9b68-b84b894a09a6","뜻을 풀거나 더 널리 알려진 표현으로 바꾸어야 한다",{"id":307,"optionText":308,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":10},"01a07864-16c2-7c13-9b68-b84b8a0d10da","온라인 매체에서 반복되면 독자 범위를 확인하지 않고 그대로 써도 된다","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_f9f10af0-8ccf-446d-a85a-93f01f619b0a_hero.webp?v=1788726220",{"title":311,"slug":312,"language":313,"level":314},"신조어의 파생 문법과 확장","sinjoeo-ui-pasaeng-munbeop","ko","C2"]