[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ab-dbd4-7f3e-a023-b4b9391a509a":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ab-d5de-7245-aaf8-c59b501eafc4":262},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":261},"01a0e1ab-dbd4-7f3e-a023-b4b9391a509a","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ab-d5de-7245-aaf8-c59b501eafc4","Building Precise Quantified Statements","Arrange the word tiles to build a sentence. Leave out the extra word and keep the attached punctuation.","Negation and Quantifier Scope: Sentence Building","Build precise statements about negation and quantifier scope, shared manuscripts, unchecked records and numerical bounds using ordered word tiles.",2,"sentence_builder",[13,40,61,79,99,117,137,159,179,202,222,243],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7281-bd4e-e26406e75952","Build the sentence: __1__",0,"Place Not before every reviewer to deny universal agreement; agreed takes the following with-phrase. At least one reviewer did not agree; possibly all disagreed. This explicitly selects the non-unanimous reading of Every reviewer didn't agree. No cannot replace Not before every: no directly determines a noun, not an every-phrase.","Not every passenger received a refund.",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":22,"options":23,"tiles":32},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-71fd-bd4e-e264063537fe",1,[24,28],{"id":25,"optionText":26,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-714d-bd4e-e26404e2aaf6","No",false,{"id":29,"optionText":30,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-71b1-bd4e-e2640592b1e9","Not every reviewer agreed with the conclusion.",true,[33,34,35,36,37,38,39],"Not","every","reviewer","agreed","with","the","conclusion.",{"id":41,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":22,"explanation":42,"exampleSentence":43,"blanks":44},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7425-bd4e-e26409417f2f","No determines visitor, the subject of believed; that introduces the clause every camera was working. Every must precede singular camera, which takes was before working. This denies that any visitor believed all the cameras were working; it does not establish their actual condition. None cannot directly determine visitor.","No observer believed that every entrance was guarded.",[45],{"id":46,"blankNumber":22,"options":47,"tiles":54},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-73a1-bd4e-e26408a19095",[48,51],{"id":49,"optionText":50,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7305-bd4e-e2640727c77c","No visitor believed that every camera was working.",{"id":52,"optionText":53,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7349-bd4e-e26407bd2fbc","None",[26,55,56,57,34,58,59,60],"visitor","believed","that","camera","was","working.",{"id":62,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":63,"exampleSentence":64,"blanks":65},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-756d-bd4e-e2640a5c349b","Initial Not precedes all entries, putting the universal claim within the scope of negation. The plural subject precedes were and the final adjective legible. At least one entry was illegible; possibly all were. None cannot replace Not before all or replace all as a determiner of entries.","Not all labels were readable.",[66],{"id":67,"blankNumber":22,"options":68,"tiles":74},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7509-bd4e-e2640a3ae62b",[69,71],{"id":70,"optionText":53,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7499-bd4e-e26409932f02",{"id":72,"optionText":73,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-74d5-bd4e-e2640a23639b","Not all entries were legible.",[33,75,76,77,78],"all","entries","were","legible.",{"id":80,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":81,"explanation":82,"exampleSentence":83,"blanks":84},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-76a9-bd4e-e2640cd09a58",3,"Not precedes all inspectors to negate the universal claim; reviewed takes the object the same manuscript, with same between the and manuscript. Without a previously identified manuscript, the sentence denies that there was one shared manuscript reviewed by all the inspectors. It does not identify a particular manuscript that someone failed to review. Each cannot replace all before plural inspectors.","Not all delegates read the same report.",[85],{"id":86,"blankNumber":22,"options":87,"tiles":94},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-764d-bd4e-e2640bea267a",[88,91],{"id":89,"optionText":90,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-75dd-bd4e-e2640b11c64f","Not all inspectors reviewed the same manuscript.",{"id":92,"optionText":93,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7619-bd4e-e2640b947e54","each",[33,75,95,96,38,97,98],"inspectors","reviewed","same","manuscript.",{"id":100,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":101,"explanation":102,"exampleSentence":103,"blanks":104},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-77e9-bd4e-e2640eed2e81",4,"Every determines singular editor, forming the subject before reviewed. The object follows the verb, with same between the and manuscript. This explicitly requires a shared manuscript, while allowing additional reading. All cannot directly determine singular count noun editor.","Every researcher examined the same dataset.",[105],{"id":106,"blankNumber":22,"options":107,"tiles":114},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-778d-bd4e-e2640e315b88",[108,111],{"id":109,"optionText":110,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7719-bd4e-e2640d59bb9b","All",{"id":112,"optionText":113,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7759-bd4e-e2640db7caf9","Every editor reviewed the same manuscript.",[115,116,96,38,97,98],"Every","editor",{"id":118,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":119,"explanation":120,"exampleSentence":121,"blanks":122},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7929-bd4e-e26410027858",5,"Keep At most together before one alarm, then place was before working. This excludes two or more working alarms but allows either one or zero. If the context specifies exactly two alarms, this bound expresses the not-both reading; the sentence itself does not specify the total number of alarms. At more one is not a grammatical numerical expression.","At most one lift was operational.",[123],{"id":124,"blankNumber":22,"options":125,"tiles":132},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-78cd-bd4e-e2640f7cfb54",[126,129],{"id":127,"optionText":128,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7855-bd4e-e2640f508bb1","more",{"id":130,"optionText":131,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7895-bd4e-e2640f5eb5a5","At most one alarm was working.",[133,134,135,136,59,60],"At","most","one","alarm",{"id":138,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":139,"explanation":140,"exampleSentence":141,"blanks":142},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7a81-bd4e-e264126a2e7c",6,"Neither determines singular lock, forming the subject before prevented. Anyone is the object of prevented, followed by from and the -ing form entering. Neither supplies the negative meaning that licenses anyone: neither of the two locks stopped even one person from entering. Both cannot determine singular lock.","Neither barrier prevented anyone from leaving.",[143],{"id":144,"blankNumber":22,"options":145,"tiles":152},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7a29-bd4e-e26411ee7769",[146,149],{"id":147,"optionText":148,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7999-bd4e-e26410f4ed2c","Neither lock prevented anyone from entering.",{"id":150,"optionText":151,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-79e9-bd4e-e264116e3888","Both",[153,154,155,156,157,158],"Neither","lock","prevented","anyone","from","entering.",{"id":160,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":161,"explanation":162,"exampleSentence":163,"blanks":164},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7bb9-bd4e-e2641336f635",7,"Initial Not negates receiving and licenses any complaints as its object. The whole phrase Not receiving any complaints is the subject of was; unexpected completes the main clause. This places the absence of complaints inside the subject, rather than negating the judgement that it was unexpected. Receives cannot replace the gerund receiving in this subject phrase.","Not finding any errors was surprising.",[165],{"id":166,"blankNumber":22,"options":167,"tiles":174},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7b69-bd4e-e264132a44eb",[168,171],{"id":169,"optionText":170,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7b01-bd4e-e2641290a72b","receives",{"id":172,"optionText":173,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7b39-bd4e-e264131a4d56","Not receiving any complaints was unexpected.",[33,175,176,177,59,178],"receiving","any","complaints","unexpected.",{"id":180,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":181,"explanation":182,"exampleSentence":183,"blanks":184},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7cf1-bd4e-e264155efc1e",8,"There is introduces an existing receipt; the following relative clause I haven't checked identifies it as unchecked. Negation belongs inside that clause, not to the receipt's existence. Are cannot replace is with singular a receipt. Nothing is established about other receipts.","There are some invoices that the accountant has not approved.",[185],{"id":186,"blankNumber":22,"options":187,"tiles":194},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7c95-bd4e-e26414aaa4b8",[188,191],{"id":189,"optionText":190,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7c25-bd4e-e2641429ae6f","There is a receipt I haven't checked.",{"id":192,"optionText":193,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7c5d-bd4e-e264144dd227","are",[195,196,197,198,199,200,201],"There","is","a","receipt","I","haven't","checked.",{"id":203,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":204,"explanation":205,"exampleSentence":206,"blanks":207},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7e21-bd4e-e26416c0ffa0",9,"Keep Fewer than three together before rooms to form the quantified subject, followed by were and the final adjective available. This establishes an upper bound of two and allows zero. Was cannot replace were because the subject has the plural head rooms.","The building has fewer than three accessible entrances.",[208],{"id":209,"blankNumber":22,"options":210,"tiles":216},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7dcd-bd4e-e264165682d1",[211,213],{"id":212,"optionText":59,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7d5d-bd4e-e26415bcd978",{"id":214,"optionText":215,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7d99-bd4e-e26415cc451b","Fewer than three rooms were available.",[217,218,219,220,77,221],"Fewer","than","three","rooms","available.",{"id":223,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":224,"explanation":225,"exampleSentence":226,"blanks":227},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7f45-bd4e-e26418eebfde",10,"At least precedes one applicant; this singular subject precedes lacks and its object the required qualifications. Required stays between the and qualifications. At least one asserts a shortfall for one or more applicants. At less one is ungrammatical.","At least one candidate lacks the necessary experience.",[228],{"id":229,"blankNumber":22,"options":230,"tiles":237},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7ef1-bd4e-e2641874b5f5",[231,234],{"id":232,"optionText":233,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7e85-bd4e-e264172fb747","At least one applicant lacks the required qualifications.",{"id":235,"optionText":236,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd5-7ebd-bd4e-e26417e315be","less",[133,238,135,239,240,38,241,242],"least","applicant","lacks","required","qualifications.",{"id":244,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":245,"explanation":246,"exampleSentence":247,"blanks":248},"01a0e1ab-dbd6-70da-b3f8-c560e782da12",11,"Exactly modifies three before deliveries, forming the subject; plural deliveries requires were, followed by the final adjective late. The count is precisely three late deliveries, neither more nor fewer. Was cannot replace were with this plural subject.","Exactly two payments were overdue.",[249],{"id":250,"blankNumber":22,"options":251,"tiles":257},"01a0e1ab-dbd6-7086-b3f8-c560e7334c4b",[252,255],{"id":253,"optionText":254,"isCorrect":31,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ab-dbd6-700e-b3f8-c560e613a623","Exactly three deliveries were late.",{"id":256,"optionText":59,"isCorrect":27,"displayOrder":22},"01a0e1ab-dbd6-7052-b3f8-c560e679a503",[258,219,259,77,260],"Exactly","deliveries","late.","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_b4c64864-65e1-4d86-98c6-b5fc497ac990_hero.webp?v=1790492531",{"title":263,"slug":264,"language":265,"level":266},"Negation, Quantifier Scope and Ambiguity","negation-quantifier-scope-and-ambiguity","en","C2"]