[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-c626-78a6-86e0-e518c065bc26":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b51d-7a14-bc92-3b5acab86526":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-c626-78a6-86e0-e518c065bc26","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b51d-7a14-bc92-3b5acab86526","判断线索边界与交际风险","根据书面线索、人物关系和交流目的，选择有依据的判断或回应。信息不足时，不要强行认定赞许或反讽。","反讽立场解读练习：线索边界与交际选择","本组通过选词填空练习判断反讽的证据边界与交际作用，材料涉及聊天记录、公开会议、上下级对话和责任争议。学习者需结合前后文识别引号、感叹号及文字转述的局限，在信息不足时保留判断，并比较追问、直接提出修改要求与带有嘲弄意味的回应，分析熟人关系、公开场合和权力差异如何影响表达的接受程度及沟通风险。",1,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a0e1ad-c626-7d46-86e0-e518c261f84b","聊天截图只保留了一句“你可真行”，没有前后文，也不知道对方做了什么。仅凭这张截图，最稳妥的判断是__1__。",0,"截图没有提供行为事实或前文立场，无法检验字面评价与事实是否冲突。“可真”和缺少否定词都不能单独决定实际态度。","只看到“真是个天才”一句，仍要知道是在赞扬解题能力，还是在评论一次失误。",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":10,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-c626-7c96-86e0-e518c2289608",[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c626-7b3e-86e0-e518c0e21cb7","出现“可真”就足以确认是在责备",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c626-7bbe-86e0-e518c0e2f239","赞许和反讽都有可能，尚需了解具体情境",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c626-7c3a-86e0-e518c143a52b","没有“不”或“没”就足以确认是在赞许",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-c626-7f42-86e0-e518c4df7264","会议记录写道：“主任用‘细致周到’评价接待工作，并列举了提前确认饮食需求等具体做法。”这里的引号__1__。","引号可用来标记原话。这里列出的做法支持正面评价，没有证据把引号解释为嘲讽或记录者的反对。","新闻稿引用获奖者的“十分荣幸”，引号本身并不表示记者怀疑其诚意。",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":10,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-c626-7eca-86e0-e518c4ba3d54",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c626-7dea-86e0-e518c2dc49f1","标明引用的评价，不能单凭它判为反讽",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c626-7e36-86e0-e518c37c57d5","足以推翻后文的正面事实，证明主任不满",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c626-7e7a-86e0-e518c3dcc79f","说明记录者必然反对主任的评价",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-c627-710f-8347-11e45d8bcec7","朋友留言：“这次安排真棒！”你不知道活动情况，也没有其他消息。句末的感叹号__1__。","感叹号能加强语气，却不能单独确定立场。缺少活动事实和上下文，就不能断定是赞许还是反讽。","一条只有“服务真好！”的短评，不能仅靠标点判断作者是否满意。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":10,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-c627-70cb-8347-11e45d5c2264",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-7043-8347-11e45c329b6c","已经证明活动安排出了严重问题",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-707b-8347-11e45c762b7c","已经排除了说话者表达不满的可能",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-70a3-8347-11e45ca944fc","不足以区分热情赞许与带情绪的反讽",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-c627-7207-8347-11e460dee5de","文字旁注说，发言者把“真专业”中的“真”读得很重，但没有记录当时发生的事。即使旁注准确，也应__1__。",3,"重读可加强不同立场的评价，不是反讽的充分条件。本题判断的是旁注的证据效力，不要求在没有音频的情况下辨听语调。","即便记录写着“说话时有明显停顿”，也仍需结合所评价的事情判断态度。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":10,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-c627-71cb-8347-11e4604df8f1",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-715b-8347-11e45e8ab0ba","直接判为反讽，因为真诚赞许不能重读",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-7183-8347-11e45f56bb4a","继续寻找语境线索，重读本身不足以确认反讽",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-71a7-8347-11e45f8ee10d","直接判为赞许，因为反讽不能使用重读",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-c627-72fb-8347-11e463522f41","通知把同一场活动的地点写成了两个不同地址，负责人却说信息很明确。读者留言：“可真明确，我们到底该去哪儿？”即使没有录音，也能识别反讽，主要因为__1__。",4,"地址矛盾是事实线索，“到底该去哪儿”又明确表示无法确定地点。判断依据是前后文冲突，不是问号或固定词语。","说明书漏掉关键一步，读者写道：“讲得真完整，做到这里就没下文了。”",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":10,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-c627-72b3-8347-11e462b447b1",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-724f-8347-11e460ffa02d","两个冲突的地址和追问共同反驳了明确这一评价",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-7273-8347-11e461be8443","所有带问号的评价都必须理解为反讽",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-7293-8347-11e4624a3371","书面出现“可真”就不可能是真诚赞许",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-c627-741f-8347-11e46477ee60","老朋友忘了替你取票。你准备说：“你可真靠得住。”虽然你们认识多年，也不能据此认定__1__。",5,"熟悉程度不保证对方接受反讽；在失约情境中，这句话可能伤人。忘记取票与“靠得住”的冲突则确实可以支持反讽解读。","即使是多年好友，听到“你真会替别人考虑”也可能感到被指责，而不是被逗乐。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":10,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-c627-73df-8347-11e4640d4407",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-7343-8347-11e4635d5a5c","忘记取票可以成为这句反讽的事实依据",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-738f-8347-11e463df8330","这句表面赞许可能传达不满",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-73bb-8347-11e46406ae13","对方一定会把这句责备当作无害的玩笑",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-c627-750b-8347-11e467b62857","主管在全员会上对出错的实习生说：“真是个业务高手，第一步就弄错了。”与私下说明错误相比，这样说更需要警惕__1__。",6,"“高手”与第一步出错构成反差，公开场合和上下级关系又增加了羞辱、施压的风险。职位或赞美词都不能消除这种风险。","教师当众说“这答案真有创意，题目都没看懂”，可能让学生难以回应。",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":10,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-c627-74d3-8347-11e466d0882b",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-746b-8347-11e4653614d4","公开场合与职位差异可能使嘲讽成为羞辱或施压",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-748f-8347-11e4660c0350","只要用了“高手”，实习生就不会感到被贬低",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-74b3-8347-11e4664011dd","主管身份会让字面赞美自动成为真实立场",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-c627-75ef-8347-11e46a9a4f86","项目延期的责任尚有争议，一方说：“你们可真负责，出了问题就让我们解释。”此时若把这句话当作中性陈述，就忽略了它__1__。",7,"后半句将解释责任转移给自己的处境作为责备依据，反讽具有归责和施压作用。但说话者表达了这一立场，不等于全部责任已被客观查清。","双方还在核对记录时，一句“好一个守信用的伙伴”就可能先把对方放到被指责的位置。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":10,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-c627-75b7-8347-11e469d13904",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-7553-8347-11e46842844f","已经用客观证据查清了全部责任",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-7577-8347-11e46939af61","在争议中借反讽归责并施加压力的作用",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-7597-8347-11e4693f8556","通过赞许正式免除了对方的责任",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-c627-76d3-8347-11e46c9580b0","校对员只想让作者把错误日期改成6月18日，不希望讽刺或指责。最符合这一目的的留言是：“__1__”",8,"题目明确要求只求改正。直接指出错误并给出目标日期最清楚；另外两句突出嘲讽，且没有给出需要改成的日期。","想让同事补齐材料时，可以说：“还缺签字页，请今天补发。”",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":10,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-c627-769b-8347-11e46c50d84c",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-763b-8347-11e46b49a715","可真准确，连日期都写错了。",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-765b-8347-11e46bd56459","真是个可靠的日期，让人猜去吧。",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-767b-8347-11e46c2e1477","日期有误，请改为6月18日。",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-c627-77c7-8347-11e46f316763","同事看过你的方案，只回了一句“真有想法”。你想确认他是赞同还是有所保留，又不想先替他下结论，可以问：“__1__”",9,"原话缺少足够线索，开放地询问认可或调整意见能保留不确定性。另外两项分别预设完全赞同和蓄意讽刺，都抢先作了判断。","收到“安排得不错”的简短回复后，可以追问：“有没有哪一处你建议再改改？”",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":10,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-c627-778f-8347-11e46e677f5e",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-772b-8347-11e46d05c2eb","你是认可这个方案，还是觉得哪里需要调整？",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-774b-8347-11e46df541db","既然你已经完全赞同，我们就不用讨论了吧？",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-776f-8347-11e46e422ef1","你明明是在讽刺我，为什么不承认？",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-c627-78a7-8347-11e471ef1fa3","“你可真厉害”出现在两份记录中：甲刚独立修好设备，后文是“多亏你解决了难题”；乙擅自拆坏设备，后文是“这下全停了，谁来修”。两处应分别理解为__1__。",10,"甲的行为和后文支持正面评价，乙造成停机的事实及追责则与赞许冲突。同一肯定形式不能脱离语境固定归类。","“真及时”可用于感谢赶上的援助，也可在援助迟到、问题早已结束时表达不满。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":10,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-c627-786f-8347-11e471ad1a65",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-780f-8347-11e46fe3d049","两人都受责备，因为“可真”只用于反讽",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-782f-8347-11e47022b3d0","甲受赞许，乙受责备；相同形式因语境而表达不同立场",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-784f-8347-11e4711e91c0","两人都受赞许，因为“厉害”不能传达负面态度",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-c627-7987-8347-11e473c90535","主持人把嘉宾名字念错三次，观众写道：“准备得真充分。不过，我批评的是这次准备，不是说他永远主持不好。”解读这条评论时，应__1__。",11,"多次念错名字与“准备充分”冲突，支持反讽解读；“这次准备”和“不是说……永远……”又明确限制了否定范围。两步都不能省略。","评论说：“这次保密工作真到位，消息全传开了；我说的是这一回的处理。”其中批评不能任意扩展到所有工作。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":10,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-c627-794f-8347-11e473755a1a",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-c627-78eb-8347-11e47266be34","只看“充分”二字，将整条评论归为赞扬",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c627-790f-8347-11e472f0dda0","只看念错名字，将批评扩大为永久的能力否定",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c627-792f-8347-11e472ffe13f","先识别赞许与失误的冲突，再用后文限定批评范围","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_ff9ac5b5-4493-4a29-b4af-210b883bdc74_hero.webp?v=1790492657",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"反讽中的肯定形式与否定立场","fanfeng-zhong-de-kending-xingshi-yu-fouding-lichang","zh","C2"]