[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-c92c-7d1c-8157-7f421f5b5b4a":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b571-7a15-b519-fa7b23058c0c":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-c92c-7d1c-8157-7f421f5b5b4a","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b571-7a15-b519-fa7b23058c0c","公文主体辨析：从句法到责任","阅读公文语境，完成主体辨析或补全公文原句，注意主语省略、施事表达和责任主体，不推断材料未交代的事实。","公文无主句与施事隐去：语境辨析练习","本组围绕公文无主句与施事隐去设置选词填空，结合会议纪要、转发通知、联合行文和办理进展，辨析句法主语、动作主体与责任归属。练习要求依据上下文识别承前省略，区分通知者、决策者和执行者，并判断指令对象、批准权限及催办责任是否已有交代，避免仅凭句首形式、正式语气或结果表述推断文件未说明的事实与职责。",0,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":16,"exampleSentence":17,"blanks":18},"01a0e1ad-c92d-71f5-a7b9-5481118d7c3e","纪要写道：“评审组听取了项目组的汇报，随后提出三项修改意见。”后一分句没有另写主语，按通常的承接关系，“提出”的主体是__1__。","前一分句的主语是“评审组”，“项目组”处于“项目组的汇报”内部，并不因离后一分句更近就成为其主语。没有主体切换的标记时，“提出”通常承接“评审组”；整理纪要也不等于提出意见。","工作专班核对了名单，又向各单位征求意见；“征求”的主体仍是工作专班。",[19],{"id":20,"blankNumber":21,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7151-a7b9-548110abfbe9",1,[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7021-a7b9-54810ee6b616","项目组，后一分句承接距离最近的机构名称",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-70a1-a7b9-54810f17d987","评审组，后一分句承接前一分句的主语",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7101-a7b9-54810fca9c54","纪要整理者，后一分句的主体由记录行为确定",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":21,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-c92d-742d-a7b9-54811448d247","大厅告示只有一句：“不得携带易燃物品入内。”它不承接某个特定人物或机构。就本课采用的分析而言，这句话__1__。","适用对象可由场所范围确定，但这不等于前文已有“访客”这一主语可供恢复。落款确定发布者，也不能据此把发布者补为“携带”的主语。本课将这种不依赖特定主语的禁令按无主句理解。","面向所有访客的“禁止在展厅内吸烟”，可按无主句理解，而不必补出某个特定吸烟者。",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":21,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-c92d-73b5-a7b9-548113a32d50",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-729d-a7b9-548111adacbf","可按不依赖特定主语的无主句理解",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-72ed-a7b9-54811276689d","可按承前省略主语“访客”的分句理解",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7335-a7b9-54811310acb4","可按省略主语的句子理解，主语由告示落款确定",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7625-a7b9-548116d7b0a7","进度表仅写：“延期申请已获批准。”若区分句法主语与批准行为的施事，准确的审读结论是__1__。","“延期申请”是句法主语，却不是作出批准行为的主体。“已获批准”交代了结果，没有直接交代谁批准。","“预算草案已经审议通过”以预算草案为主语，但单凭此句无法确定审议机构。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":21,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-c92d-75a9-a7b9-5481164a373c",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-74d5-a7b9-548114e98fda","没有写出批准者，因此没有句法主语",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7519-a7b9-5481150313da","延期申请既是主语，也是批准者",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7565-a7b9-5481159a10b4","句中有主语，但没有明示批准者",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7831-a7b9-5481187f9108","办事说明写道：“现场核验由受理窗口安排。”按本课的分析，句法主语与“安排”的施事分别是__1__。",3,"“现场核验”是被安排的事项，处于主语位置；“由受理窗口”明示安排行为的施事。实际核验人员是否属于该窗口，句中没有交代，不能把核验者当作安排者。","“相关材料由申请人提交”以“相关材料”为主语，“申请人”是提交行为的施事。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":21,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7791-a7b9-5481185e409d",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-76c1-a7b9-548117bef69e","受理窗口、受理窗口",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7705-a7b9-548117d51215","现场核验、受理窗口",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7741-a7b9-548117da18f6","现场核验、未明示的核验人员",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7a19-a7b9-54811a7c2b2a","纪要由办公室整理，正文写道：“管委会审议了开放方案，决定下月起试行；具体调整由场馆中心牵头落实。”若只补出“决定”前承前省略的主语，保持原意，应填__1__。",4,"“决定”承接前一分句的主语“管委会”。牵头落实属于执行环节，不能据此增列共同决策者；办公室整理纪要，也不因此成为纪要中决定的作出者。","院务会审议了调整方案，决定先行试点；后勤处负责实施。补写决策主语时仍应写院务会。",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":21,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-c92d-799d-a7b9-548119f0dad6",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-78c5-a7b9-548118975df8","管委会",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7915-a7b9-54811935feb5","管委会与场馆中心",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7955-a7b9-548119ce20e4","办公室",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7c01-a7b9-54811dee5cf1","办理规则写道：“涉及跨区协作的申请，须先交由联席会议研究，再进入审批程序。”其中“交由联席会议研究”__1__。",5,"“交由联席会议研究”把研究任务交给联席会议，因而明示了研究者。“经研究”本身不点明研究者；研究之后还要进入审批程序，也不能据此认定联席会议就是批准者。","有关事项先交由专家委员会论证，再报主管部门审批；论证者与审批者分别出现。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":21,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7b89-a7b9-54811d1ab20d",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7ab1-a7b9-54811b7525fb","只交代了研究程序，与“经研究”一样未指明研究者",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7af9-a7b9-54811be4765e","同时明确了研究者和批准者，两者均为联席会议",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7b41-a7b9-54811c82276c","明确了研究环节的承担者，尚未交代批准者",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7dc9-a7b9-5481206f168a","区政府办公室向所属单位转发区政府的决定。通知落款为区政府办公室，首句为“现将有关决定转发给你们”，此前没有正文。若为分析句法而补出首句省略的主语，应写：“__1__现将有关决定转发给你们。”",6,"这里的转发主体由发文行为和落款确定，并非承接正文中先前出现的主语。区政府作出决定，所属单位接收通知，二者都不能替代实施本次转发的办公室。","秘书处转发理事会决议时，“现将决议转发如下”的转发主体可由秘书处的落款确定。",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":21,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7d5d-a7b9-548120616d95",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7ca1-a7b9-54811eb05301","区政府",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7ce5-a7b9-54811f6bbd64","区政府办公室",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7d21-a7b9-54811fbf7ff8","区政府及其所属单位",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7f85-a7b9-5481221b6179","两局联合印发的工作简报写道：“经研究，决定设立联合受理点；具体筹备工作由甲局负责，乙局派员协助。”简报未附会议记录。若将此段用于核对决策权限，审读意见应为：__1__。",7,"“经研究，决定”未在句内点明两个环节的主体。甲局负责筹备只明确执行分工；两局联合印发也不能证明两局共同研究并作出决定。核对权限时，应依据记录分别核实，再补明主体，不能从后文分工倒推。","联合简报中的“经讨论，同意调整”若用于核查审批权限，应补明讨论者与批准者，不能只看印发机关。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":21,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7f0d-a7b9-54812176fb11",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7e5d-a7b9-548120840bf9","应核实并补明研究者与决策者，筹备分工不能替代这两项信息",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7e9d-a7b9-548120ab7b91","可将甲局补为研究者与决策者，筹备负责人就是前两项行为的主体",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92d-7ed5-a7b9-54812122283a","可将两局补为共同研究者与决策者，联合印发已经证明共同作出决定",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-c92e-720f-a98f-5b21fe29561a","通知发给申报单位和受理中心，正文写道：“受理中心已完成初审。请于六月十日前将缺失材料补交至指定窗口；受理中心收到后统一登记。”就“补交”的执行主体而言，定稿前应__1__。",8,"前句说明初审者，后句说明登记者，都不能自动确定中间指令的执行主体。“请”不保证承接前句主语，多类单位收文也不表示共同承担补交任务；应核实并写明指令对象。","通知同时发给学校和服务中心时，“请报送学生名单”应明确报送对象，不能仅靠收文名单分配任务。",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":21,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7193-a98f-5b21fde1550b",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92e-70a3-a98f-5b21fc5952cf","沿用前句的受理中心，“请”后的动作必然承接最近的主语",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92e-70fb-a98f-5b21fcc5eec7","把两类收文单位均列为补交者，共同收文就意味着承担相同任务",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7147-a98f-5b21fd4cc624","核实并明示指令对象，不能仅凭前句主语或共同收文身份确定",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7403-a98f-5b22011ed5f1","催办清单写道：“相关手续仍在办理中。”该句能否直接提供催办对象？准确的判断是：__1__。",9,"句法主语“相关手续”指正在办理的事项，不指实施办理行为的机构。报告进展的编制者也不一定经办手续。用于催办时，还须核实经办单位，不能为了补齐句子而擅自认定责任主体。","“维修正在进行”说明进展；要催促承修方，还需核实由谁负责维修。",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":21,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7393-a98f-5b22009808cc",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92e-72af-a98f-5b21ff1e9f49","不能；“相关手续”是主语，实际经办者仍须核实",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92e-72f7-a98f-5b21ff829fbb","能；“相关手续”占据主语位置，因而也指明了承担办理责任的一方",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7333-a98f-5b21ffea33f6","能；“正在办理”的进展由清单编制者报告，因而编制者就是经办者",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-c92e-75b7-a98f-5b22036320d7","原文为“承办单位应当及时核实，并将核实结果反馈给申请人”。编辑仅把“应当及时核实，并将核实结果反馈给申请人”摘作独立办理要求，页面没有标题或其他上下文。摘引后，__1__。",10,"原文的“承办单位”支配核实和反馈两个动作。独立摘引后，读者无法从前文恢复这个主体；“应当”只表示义务，“申请人”则是反馈对象，都不能替代义务主体。应依据原文补回承办单位。","“设备科应当定期检查”的后半句若独立印在责任卡上，应保留“设备科”，使义务归属清楚。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":21,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-c92e-754f-a98f-5b2202d17847",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92e-748b-a98f-5b2201fc3e15","“申请人”成为句中唯一的机构或人员名称，因而自然接替被省略的义务主体",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92e-74d3-a98f-5b22020c0861","义务仍被表达出来，但承担义务的一方失去明确指向，应据原文补回",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92e-750f-a98f-5b22026aefc2","“应当”已经标明义务性质，因而也能独立确定由谁核实和反馈",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-c92e-774f-a98f-5b22056d3605","通报正文为“积水已经排除”，附件汇总表将该事项标为“已处理”，现场照片显示路面已无积水。若审查的是具体履职情况，对这些材料的判断应为：__1__。",11,"正文、状态标记和照片都围绕结果展开，不能仅凭这些材料确定谁采取了什么措施，更不能直接认定责任单位已按要求履职。核对过程记录是补足证据的环节，提交记录本身也不等于已经证明履职合格。","通报称“故障已排除”并附运行照片，仍不能代替对维修单位、维修措施及完成时间的核查。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":21,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-c92e-76e7-a98f-5b2204fac7c8",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-c92e-7633-a98f-5b2204098283","正文与状态标记相互印证，已经足以确定处置主体及其采取的具体措施",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-c92e-766f-a98f-5b2204473636","照片补充了现场证据，已经足以认定负有职责的单位按要求完成了处置",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-c92e-76ab-a98f-5b2204c19e4a","能够支持结果描述，但仍须核对处置单位提交的过程记录，查明主体与措施","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_70c9f71e-f78a-4c31-b427-20dcabd2a82e_hero.webp?v=1790492657",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"公文中的无主句与施事隐去","gongwen-zhong-de-wuzhuju-yu-shishi-yinqu","zh","C2"]