[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-d290-79aa-a0e9-afa4da6f262d":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b686-7a21-b91d-f21ada22ac38":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-d290-79aa-a0e9-afa4da6f262d","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b686-7a21-b91d-f21ada22ac38","工作说明中的压缩与展开","结合原文和写作任务，选择结构清楚、信息完整且不擅自增加结论的表达。","名词化练习：工作说明中的压缩与展开","本组通过十二道选词填空练习名词化表达中的压缩与展开，以教学评价、资料审核、调查安排和工作说明为语境。题目关注长定语中的参与者、时间与条件，要求保留否定、可能性及重新等限制，并在行动步骤中选择清楚的动词分句。每题附解释和不同情境的例句，帮助辨明中心事件及各方关系，检查改写是否擅自增加结果或改变原意。",1,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a0e1ad-d290-7d1e-a0e9-afa4de615709","这里的“教师评价”指学生评价教师，而非教师评价学生。为明确评价双方，应写：本节介绍__1__的具体安排。",0,"语境已明确学生是评价者、教师是评价对象，必须把两个角色写清。其余选项分别调换了双方或改换了评价对象。","家长对课程的评价将单独汇总。",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":10,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-d290-7cbe-a0e9-afa4dd8e7818",[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d290-7c0e-a0e9-afa4dabb9624","教师对学生的评价",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d290-7c62-a0e9-afa4dbb6e16b","学生对教师的评价",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d290-7c92-a0e9-afa4dc946077","教师对教学的评价",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-d290-7e26-a0e9-afa4e01e8035","原文是：“专家将在下周审核学校提交的方案。”压缩时不得把提交时间误写成下周：通知说明了__1__的安排。","下周修饰审核，学校是方案提交者，专家是审核者。第一项交换了双方，第二项把下周移到提交上，改变了时间与事件的关系。","编辑明天对作者所交稿件的复核已经列入日程。",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":10,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-d290-7dee-a0e9-afa4e00d4660",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d290-7d7e-a0e9-afa4deb9b42f","学校下周对专家所提交方案的审核",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d290-7daa-a0e9-afa4def8c7dc","专家对学校下周所提交方案的审核",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d290-7dca-a0e9-afa4df4f8288","专家下周对学校所提交方案的审核",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-d290-7f0e-a0e9-afa4e1c1e85e","为避免长定语，纪要先交代前提，再用动词说明后续行动：经费到位后，团队将__1__。","前提已由前一分句交代，“将”后用“重新调查”说明团队的行动，并保留调查对象的限制。其余两项都把调查包装成名词性短语，不能在这里直接充当行动谓语。拆开条件与行动，比继续叠加定语清楚。","设备修好后，技术组将重新检测此前无法处理的样品。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":10,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-d290-7ed6-a0e9-afa4e174c7aa",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d290-7e72-a0e9-afa4e0c6cdcf","重新调查尚未联系上的住户",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d290-7e96-a0e9-afa4e0ceecbb","对尚未联系上的住户的重新调查",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d290-7eb6-a0e9-afa4e10f81f2","尚未联系上的住户所接受的重新调查",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-d291-7076-8283-1530f9fc161d","秘书核对记录后写道：“这不是个人主张，也不是尚待证实的推测，而是__1__：委员会尚未批准修改方案。”",3,"前文明确排除了个人主张和未证实的推测，“事实”才与核对记录后的表述一致。“可能性”降低了确定程度，“观点”则把记录所确认的情况改成个人立场；两者与本句前半部分矛盾。","这不是作者的推测，而是记录可以证实的事实：设备曾两次停机。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":10,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-d291-7036-8283-1530f91792a0",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d290-7f56-a0e9-afa4e2266aa8","尚待证实的可能性",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d290-7f7e-a0e9-afa4e30dc8d2","已经核实的事实",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d290-7f9e-a0e9-afa4e3dd0b17","个人提出的观点",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-d291-715e-8283-1530fdfb4c47","操作说明需要直接交代连续行动。填入后应构成完整的指令：工作人员应__1__。",4,"“应”后直接接动词分句，可以清楚地交代三步行动。第一项把每个动作都写成带“的”的名词性短语，却没有谓语承接；第二项把“依次进行”也压成名词性结构，不能直接充当这里的行动谓语。名词性表达并非都错，但这些形式不适合当前句法位置。","请先保存文件，再关闭系统。",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":10,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-d291-7126-8283-1530fd691bda",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-70be-8283-1530fac1f1c1","先对编号的核对，再对缺项的登记，最后对提交人的联系",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-70e2-8283-1530fb88eba0","编号核对、缺项登记与提交人联系的依次进行",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-7102-8283-1530fc6b668b","先核对编号，再登记缺项，最后联系提交人",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-d291-7246-8283-1531014c1e50","原句是“编辑将对修改建议的落实情况进行核查”。改成直接交代行动的句子，且不预先断定建议已落实：编辑将__1__。",5,"核查是否已落实保留了核查任务，也不预设结果。确认均已落实把结果写死，落实建议则把编辑的任务由核查改成执行。","管理员会检查设备是否已关闭。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":10,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-d291-720a-8283-153100b126fd",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-71a2-8283-1530fe6c036c","核查修改建议是否已落实",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-71c6-8283-1530ff286230","确认所有修改建议均已落实",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-71ea-8283-1530ffe9355c","落实所有已核查的修改建议",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-d291-7326-8283-153102ce41a7","讨论尚无结论，会上提出的是一个疑问：“__1__？”",6,"“是否”把命题组织成待回答的问题，符合尚无结论的语境。第一项在这个独立问句末尾多加了“的”，没有形成完整结构；第三项用“事实”把待判断的内容当成已经成立的情况。这里也没有引述并质疑他人所谓事实的语境。","会上提出的问题是：“这项安排是否合理？”",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":10,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-d291-72ee-8283-1531029f4add",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-728a-8283-15310238f73f","样本是否具有代表性的",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-72ae-8283-1531028111af","样本是否具有代表性",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-72ce-8283-153102838536","样本具有代表性这一事实",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-d291-7432-8283-153105b99fe3","下一节不讨论数量或来源，而要检验所选对象能否反映总体；也就是说，该节讨论的不是样本量或抽样地点，而是__1__。",7,"“代表性”把能否反映总体这一性质作为讨论对象，与前题的“是否”分句形成对照。“来源”和“规模”也是完整的名词性短语，但分别指向出处与数量，与本句明确排除的讨论范围冲突。","这一节不比较费用高低，而是分析方案的可行性。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":10,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-d291-73fa-8283-1531053d82a3",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-7392-8283-153102ee8522","样本的来源",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-73ba-8283-153103a370f8","样本的规模",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-73da-8283-153104756861","样本的代表性",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-d291-751e-8283-1531085d6c63","办公室按职责区分工作人员。下面用省略中心语的形式说明其中一人的情况：__1__今天请假了。",8,"“负责审核的”省略了“工作人员”，仍然指人，因此可以接“请假了”。另外两项分别指审核活动和工作完成这一事件，不能作为请假的人。能作主语的名词性表达，并不都能指代人员。","负责接待的今天会提前到场。",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":10,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-d291-74e6-8283-1531079fdb7c",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-7482-8283-153105f5c5d9","负责审核的",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-74a6-8283-153106c33549","对材料的审核",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-74c6-8283-15310705fd95","审核工作的完成",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-d291-75fe-8283-15310a174b73","原文只说“本研究的目的在于对误差来源的识别”，并未报告发现。编辑把绕远的动作关系改成“旨在”直接带动词的结构：本研究旨在__1__。",9,"“旨在”后用“识别”直接交代研究要做什么，保留目的而不宣称已经完成。“旨在误差来源的识别”和“旨在对误差来源的识别工作”都把所需的动作表达换成了不能直接接在这里的名词性结构；后者若保留，需补出“开展”等动词。","本项目旨在查明故障原因，并不预先认定任何部门负有责任。",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":10,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-d291-75c6-8283-1531098350ec",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-7566-8283-153108bd7110","误差来源的识别",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-7586-8283-153108c3408c","识别误差来源",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-75a6-8283-1531090961af","对误差来源的识别工作",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-d291-76de-8283-15310c7218a8","这里的改动由任课者作出，针对其给班级成员打分的方法，不涉及校方考核教职工。消除原稿的角色歧义后，可写成“教师对__1__”。",10,"题干明确评价者是教师，评价对象是学生，调整的是评价方式。正确项补全后为“教师对学生评价方式的调整”。其余两项分别改成教师之间的评价或对学校制度的调整，均不符合已经限定的参与者关系与改动对象。","研究员对助手记录方式的调整，不等于助手对研究员记录方式的调整。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":10,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-d291-76a6-8283-15310c43be2d",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-7642-8283-15310a8d0e42","教师评价标准的调整",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-7666-8283-15310b46b84b","学校考核制度的调整",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-7686-8283-15310beb48ef","学生评价方式的调整",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-d291-77ba-8283-15310da28522","原稿说“样本量过小可能影响了结果”。讨论中尚无证据确认这种影响，因此摘要写道：“我们要检验的不是已经成立的事实，而是__1__。”",11,"“这种可能性”把原句的“可能”转为讨论对象，同时保留影响尚未确定这一判断。两个“事实”选项都与“尚无证据确认”及“不是已经成立的事实”冲突；第三项还擅自加入否定，改变了待检验的命题。","目前要检验的是温度变化影响了读数这种可能性，而不是把这种影响直接写成事实。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":10,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-d291-7782-8283-15310d92c9d7",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-d291-7722-8283-15310c8bb2f6","样本量过小影响了结果这一事实",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-d291-7746-8283-15310c8bc67a","样本量过小影响了结果这种可能性",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-d291-7766-8283-15310d77905d","样本量过小未影响结果这一事实","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_9542f553-2e16-438f-8d8e-1e1b861df8ad_hero.webp?v=1790492660",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"名词化与学术表达的信息密度","mingcihua-yu-xueshu-biaoda-de-xinxi-midu","zh","C1"]