[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-da70-7853-8d59-9199f56c4c29":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b777-7db9-ae4e-1d1b5ef356fe":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-da70-7853-8d59-9199f56c4c29","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b777-7db9-ae4e-1d1b5ef356fe","文言残留的语序与判断关系","阅读各段文字，选择符合指定理解角度、且不改变原意的答案。注意宾语前置、限定范围、反问立场和判断关系。","文言残留结构理解练习：语序判断与连接关系","本组以选词填空练习现代评论和论说中的文言残留结构，围绕企业经营、人才选拔、团队决策、展览安排与责任归属，辨析唯的限定、是与之的作用、何字反问、非乃判断及连接关系。题目要求还原语序，区分说话者立场与事实，并在现代改述中保留原有的强调和辩护力度，避免扩大否定范围，或把固定格式任意套用于日常表达。",0,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":16,"exampleSentence":17,"blanks":18},"01a0e1ad-da70-7c3f-8d59-9199f8d27693","评论写道：“企业当然可以获利，但若唯利是图，便会把安全当作可省的成本。”这里批评的是__1__。","“唯”限定为“只”，“唯利是图”在这里带有批评意味；前文明确认可合理获利，因此不能把批评扩大为反对一切利润，也不能理解为没有追求利润。","即使今年收入增加了，也不能据此认定这家书店唯利是图。",[19],{"id":20,"blankNumber":21,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-da70-7bb3-8d59-9199f820c9ae",1,[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da70-7ab7-8d59-9199f657ebf4","任何获得利润的经营行为",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da70-7b1f-8d59-9199f72b4883","把利润当作唯一追求而忽视安全",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da70-7b67-8d59-9199f760c1f0","没有把利润列为经营目标",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":21,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-da70-7e43-8d59-9199fbfcbd23","语法注释要解释“唯才是举”中的“是”，应写成：__1__。","在“唯／惟＋宾语＋是＋动词”中，“是”是提宾标志，不是判断词，也不表示动作完成；这里的“才”是“举”的宾语。","读到“唯命是从”时，应把“命”理解为“从”的对象，而不是把“是”读成判断词。",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":21,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-da70-7dcf-8d59-9199fbc13a17",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da70-7ce3-8d59-9199f9cef1a5","把“才”和“举”连接为两个相同的事物",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da70-7d2b-8d59-9199fa2658ef","说明选拔人才这件事已经完成",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da70-7d8b-8d59-9199fac99318","标明宾语“才”被放在动词“举”之前",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-da71-70b8-95e5-822322259a56","选拔公告解释：“本次唯才是举，不问家世。”按这句话的用词，“才”和“举”分别指__1__。","“不问家世”把语境限定在人才选拔。“才”指人才，“举”指选拔，不是时间副词“才”，也不是举起或列举。","若评审口称唯才是举，却先查应聘者的亲属关系，这一原则便没有落实。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":21,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-da71-702c-95e5-822321d3cdca",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da70-7ed3-8d59-9199fc13231c","有才干的人；选拔",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da70-7f1f-8d59-9199fcb20428","刚刚发生；举起",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da70-7f7b-8d59-9199fcdd0d25","有才干的人；列举",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-da71-7290-95e5-82232507e2a0","校记写道：“原件缺失，是以暂据抄本。然则两处异文如何取舍？盖抄写时有所改动，尚待核实。”按出现顺序，三个连接语分别用于__1__。",3,"“是以”引出原件缺失后的处理办法；“然则”承接采用抄本这一前提提出问题，不等于“然而”，也没有否定前提；“盖”结合“尚待核实”提出待证的解释，不能读成确证的原因。","原稿未存，是以参照初刊。然则异文从何而来？盖排印时有误，仍须查证。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":21,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-da71-721c-95e5-8223242684f9",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-714c-95e5-822322a4a502","引出处理结果、转折否定前提、提出待证解释",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7194-95e5-82232320107f","引出处理结果、承接前提发问、提出待证解释",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-71d8-95e5-822323a521a7","引出处理结果、承接前提发问、交代确证原因",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-da71-7488-95e5-822327289859","甲文称：“救援时，他唯命是从，保证了行动协调。”乙文称：“讨论时，他唯命是从，从不指出方案的漏洞。”比较两处用法，正确的理解是__1__。",4,"“唯命是从”的褒贬要看语境。“保证了行动协调”给出肯定评价，“从不指出……漏洞”则呈现批评，不能仅凭格式判定褒贬。","传记先记述他以唯命是从为荣，随后又写他开始反省这种处事方式。",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":21,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-da71-7410-95e5-822326ac3500",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-7320-95e5-82232564e18c","两处都必然表示赞扬，因为服从命令总是优点",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7380-95e5-822325f3794b","两处都必然表示批评，因为这一格式只能用于贬义",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-73cc-95e5-822326a1a197","甲肯定服从带来的协调，乙批评服从造成的不加质疑",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-da71-768c-95e5-822329bf6573","店主把“唯咖啡是喝”印在杯子上，作为故意仿古的玩笑。读者据此能作出的判断是__1__。",5,"题目明示“故意仿古的玩笑”，因此可理解其意思，却不能忽略戏谑色彩。沿用格式不等于可以无限自由生成，也不等于新造说法必然无法理解。","若正式报告处处仿造“唯……是……”的句式，原本平实的叙述就容易变成刻意仿古。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":21,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-da71-75f8-95e5-82232928726d",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-751c-95e5-822328059f43","这里有意套用旧格式，不能据此把它当作中性的日常说法",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7568-95e5-82232809ad44","既然能读懂，所有宾语和动词都可这样组合而不改变语体",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-75b4-95e5-82232903757c","既然不是常见固定说法，便不可能表达任何可理解的意思",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-da71-7860-95e5-82232c124b71","有人批评周末开放展厅的安排，策展人为这一安排辩护：“周末开放，何害之有？”这里“何害之有”应理解为__1__。",6,"“何害之有”把宾语放到“有”之前；结合辩护语境，它不是索取害处清单，而是以反问表达否认。这是策展人的立场，不等于已经证明该安排没有害处。","有人指责把会议缩短是不负责，主持人回应：“议题已经讨论清楚，何错之有？”",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":21,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-da71-77e8-95e5-82232b2802f8",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-771c-95e5-82232a29aac3","有哪些已经查明的害处，请逐项列出",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7760-95e5-82232a6ea558","有什么害处呢，意在反问并否认有害处",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-77a8-95e5-82232aa2e9d0","既然已有害处，就必须立即停止开放",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-da71-7a44-95e5-82232f5fe4a4","读书笔记写道：“‘何罪之有’中的‘之’，可以直接换成表示领属的‘的’。”对此应作的修正是__1__。",7,"“何＋名词性成分＋之有”是宾语前置格式，“之”不是领属连接，也不提供人物身份。现代语序是“有什么罪”。","对“何惧之有”的理解应从“有什么可怕的”入手，不能机械地逐字替换成“的”。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":21,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-da71-79c8-95e5-82232e6e09a0",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-78f4-95e5-82232c8064c4","这里的“之”表示“罪”属于后面的“有”",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-793c-95e5-82232d3ea9a8","这里的“之”代指受指责的人，理解时须补出其姓名",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-7984-95e5-82232e237f0b","这里的“之”用于宾语前置，理解时要还原为“有什么罪”",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-da71-7c20-95e5-822331d3d0d2","被批评为多管闲事后，邻居回应：“我只是提醒大家关好楼门，何错之有？”若既保留原意又保留辩护力度，改述应选__1__。",8,"题目同时要求保留原意和辩护力度。“有什么错呢”保留反问；平直的“没有错”虽能表达否认，却削弱质问力度；承认有错则反转立场。","面对指责，作者问“如实记录，何罪之有”，比单说“如实记录无罪”更有质问意味。",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":21,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-da71-7bac-95e5-822330e392af",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-7ad8-95e5-82232f868ed5","我只是提醒大家关好楼门，这有什么错呢？",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7b20-95e5-82232fae01dc","我只是提醒大家关好楼门，这件事没有错。",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-7b68-95e5-822330a9d69d","我只是提醒大家关好楼门，但承认这样做有错。",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-da71-7dec-95e5-82233478c1d1","调查结语写道：“此次延误，非设备之过，乃调度之失也。”结语否定的是__1__。",9,"“非……乃……也”在这里对举两种归因：否定设备归因，肯定调度归因。它没有否认延误，也没有把责任转回设备。","“争议非价格之争，乃程序之争也”是否定一种性质判断，并非说争议不存在。",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":21,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-da71-7d78-95e5-8223342fa6d3",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-7cac-95e5-822331f223a4","此次运行中发生了延误",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7cf0-95e5-822332d90dc5","此次延误是设备故障造成的",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-7d38-95e5-82233360bec9","此次调度中出现了失误",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-da72-702c-93cc-8c7b7eb38165","序言介绍一位作者：“此人非本书编者，乃资料提供者也。”对“乃”和句末“也”的说明，正确的是__1__。",10,"本句是否定一个身份、肯定另一个身份的判断。“乃”在这里相当于“是／就是”，不是“才”或“竟然”；句末“也”也不是现代汉语表示同样的副词。","说明写着“此非原作，乃后人摹本也”，意思是这不是原作，而是后来的摹本。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":21,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-da71-7f58-95e5-822335cf65bf",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da71-7e88-95e5-82233485d167","“乃”表示过了很久才成为提供者，“也”表示他同样编过此书",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da71-7ed0-95e5-822334c72b99","“乃”表示竟然提供资料，“也”表示另一个人同样如此",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da71-7f14-95e5-8223354ab2e6","“乃”肯定后一身份，“也”收束判断，并不表示“同样”",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-da72-7200-93cc-8c7b807c81f6","同一段评论先说“此乃编辑之责”，后引编辑自辩“何责之有”。两处“之”的关系应区分为__1__。",11,"“编辑之责”相当于“编辑的责任”，“之”连接修饰关系；“何责之有”相当于“有什么责任”，其中“之”服务于宾语前置，不能把两种作用混同。","“何错之有”中的“之”与“记录之错”中的“之”，虽然字形相同，结构作用却不同。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":21,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-da72-718c-93cc-8c7b80473642",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da72-70c0-93cc-8c7b7eec7759","前者连接修饰语与名词，后者用于宾语前置格式",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-da72-7108-93cc-8c7b7f9e0e96","两者都表示领属，都可以原位换成“的”",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da72-714c-93cc-8c7b8009338c","两者都用于宾语前置，都需要把“责”移到动词后","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_f4742477-300d-424e-b3f2-c4a81d0962ba_hero.webp?v=1790492662",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"文言残留结构在现代文本中的理解","wenyan-canliu-jiegou-zai-xiandai-wenben-zhong-de-lijie","zh","C2"]