[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-da8a-72a2-8b17-42ee0b83175b":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b777-7db9-ae4e-1d1b5ef356fe":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-da8a-72a2-8b17-42ee0b83175b","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b777-7db9-ae4e-1d1b5ef356fe","文言连接语与观点边界","根据上下文选择准确的阅读判断或现代改述。保留原文的逻辑关系、观点归属和不确定性，不额外补入人物或理由。","文言残留结构阅读练习：逻辑衔接与语序还原","本组通过选词填空练习文言连接语与固定句式在现代书面文本中的理解，材料涉及档案整理、图书借阅、版本比较、人才选拔和评论转述。题目要求辨认因果、推论、说明与推测，还原前置宾语，比较之的不同作用，区分作者认可与他人主张，并检查现代改述是否增添原文没有的人物、理由或确定性，同时体会文言连接语的语体特点。",1,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":16,"explanation":17,"exampleSentence":18,"blanks":19},"01a0e1ad-da8a-756e-8b17-42ee0def60ca","整理说明写道：“两份目录所记页码互有冲突，是以暂缓合并。”其中“是以”承接的理由是__1__。",0,"“是以”相当于“因此／因为这一点”，“是”回指前面的页码冲突。暂缓合并是后面的结果，删除目录则不是原文提供的理由。","旧址正在修缮，是以今年的讲座改在邻近学校举行。",[20],{"id":21,"blankNumber":10,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7512-8b17-42ee0d33b46b",[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-746a-8b17-42ee0c464bf2","整理者已经决定暂缓合并",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-74b6-8b17-42ee0c60d564","两份目录的页码记录存在冲突",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-74e6-8b17-42ee0cae2cee","有人要求删除其中一份目录",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7672-8b17-42ee1025fcb9","管理员提出：“所有借阅记录都已核清。然则这笔逾期费用从何而来？”这里“然则”的作用是__1__。","“然则”承接前句已经提出的核查结果，进一步追问费用的来由，相当于“既然如此，那么”。它没有否定核查结果，也没有说明核查为何完成。","既说这份名单已经包含所有报名者，然则补录的三人又应如何处理？",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":10,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-da8a-763a-8b17-42ee0fc56c5c",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-75ce-8b17-42ee0e4e9107","相当于“然而”，转折否定前述核查结果",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-75f2-8b17-42ee0ee7736d","相当于“因为”，引出完成核查的原因",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-761a-8b17-42ee0eeff6a8","相当于“那么”，承接核查结果提出疑问",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-da8a-777a-8b17-42ee12bf0f5a","校记写道：“此页盖为后人补入，尚待纸张检测确认。”保留证据限度的改述是__1__。","“尚待……确认”明确表明判断尚未证实，因此这里的“盖”引出推测。不能把推测变成确证，也不能把尚需检测改为不必检测。","这段批注盖出自另一位读者之手，但目前还没有足够的笔迹材料可供比对。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":10,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-da8a-773e-8b17-42ee128842ed",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-76be-8b17-42ee111b8076","这一页可能是后人补入的，还需要检测确认",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-76e2-8b17-42ee1160085a","这一页已经证实是后人补入的，只等公布结果",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-771e-8b17-42ee124a94d3","因为这一页是后人补入的，所以不必再检测",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-da8a-78da-8b17-42ee159e0863","工作记录已明确注明因漏水封闭西厅。馆长据此写道：“本周导览不进西厅，盖该厅正在处理漏水。”这里的“盖”是在__1__。",3,"前文明确说工作记录已有记载，后句说明导览不进西厅的原因；这里不能机械地把“盖”译成“大概”，也不能倒转因果。","展签说明：“此处不列作者姓名，盖原件并未署名。”后半句是在解释编排做法。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":10,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7876-8b17-42ee15243d6d",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-77c2-8b17-42ee135e63c8","引出维修这一事实，说明导览活动的后果",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7806-8b17-42ee1447c6eb","引出维修这一事实，说明导览调整的原因",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7842-8b17-42ee14adc039","提出维修这一猜测，推测导览调整的原因",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7a7e-8b17-42ee187fd4da","文章只列出两件同期发生的事：“活动开始收费后，报名人数减少，是以收费导致了人数下降。”在没有其他材料的情况下，读者应判断__1__。",4,"“是以”引出的内容明确把收费视为人数下降的原因，因此不只是复述同期变化；但连接语没有增加证据，所作推断仍需检验。","报告把调整开放时间与客流增加联系起来，即使用“因此”连接，两者是否存在因果仍需证据。",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":10,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7a36-8b17-42ee18338d5f",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7966-8b17-42ee16509937","作者用“是以”复述同期变化，并未提出因果推断",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-79be-8b17-42ee172ec352","作者用“是以”补充因果证据，支持此前的推断",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7a0a-8b17-42ee177d1137","作者用“是以”提出因果推断，其依据仍待检验",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7b6e-8b17-42ee1b7599ad","评论写道：“有人以‘唯命是从’为团队美德，并据此主张取消内部质疑。本文恰恰反对这一主张。”关于“取消内部质疑”的归属，正确的是__1__。",5,"“并据此主张”继续转述“有人”的观点，引号只划定所引词语，并不划定全部转述范围；末句又明确表示作者反对。","作者引用“唯利是图”来概括对手受到的指责，随后指出指责证据不足；引用本身不等于认可。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":10,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7b32-8b17-42ee1b0398df",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7ac6-8b17-42ee1928c63a","它仍属于前面“有人”的主张，不是本文作者的赞同意见",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7aee-8b17-42ee1a15b7d8","引号结束后，它就自动变成本文作者自己的主张",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7b12-8b17-42ee1a756aa6","由于出现了引语，本文作者必然赞同取消内部质疑",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7c6e-8b17-42ee1d58a217","招聘章程写道：“唯才是举，不限籍贯。”将前半句还原为现代动宾语序，应读作__1__。",6,"“才”指有才能的人，是“举”的前置宾语；“举”在招聘语境中指选拔，“是”标示宾语前置。还原时应把选拔对象放到动词后，不能把它读成执行选拔的人。","“唯命是从”可还原为“只听从命令”，其中“命”是听从的对象。",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":10,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7c2e-8b17-42ee1ccb870b",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7bb6-8b17-42ee1bc5e416","只列举有才能的人",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7bda-8b17-42ee1c0b8ad1","只选拔有才能的人",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7bfe-8b17-42ee1c575a3e","有才能的人才选拔",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7d52-8b17-42ee20352069","答辩先说“何错之有”，报告后说“技术之过”。分别分析两处“之”，正确的是__1__。",7,"“何错之有”应还原为“有什么错”，“之”标示宾语前置，不代指答辩人；“技术之过”相当于“技术的过错”，“之”连接修饰语与名词，不能交换这两种分析。","“何罪之有”的“之”不能译成“的”，而“管理之失”的“之”可以这样理解。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":10,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7d1a-8b17-42ee1faddad6",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7cb6-8b17-42ee1dcd2921","前者连接修饰语与名词，后者标示宾语前置",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7cda-8b17-42ee1e9d424c","前者代指受到指责的人，后者连接修饰语与名词",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7cfa-8b17-42ee1f68fbdf","前者标示宾语前置，后者连接修饰语与名词",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7e3e-8b17-42ee22236086","会议记录只写：“此非定案，乃讨论之始也。”不补入原文没有的信息，现代改述应为__1__。",8,"原句只区分当前事项的性质，没有交代主任、否决、预算或表决。可补出现代判断句需要的“是”，但不能增添施事、行为或理由。","“非人数不足，乃安排失当也”可改述为“不是人数不够，而是安排不当”，不能另加一个未经提及的负责人。",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":10,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7e06-8b17-42ee21ce6b10",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7d9a-8b17-42ee2072f63c","这不是最终决定，而是讨论的开始",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7dbe-8b17-42ee20f888bf","主任否决了最终方案，要求重新开始讨论",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7de2-8b17-42ee21ab542a","由于预算不足，大家决定推迟最终表决",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7f22-8b17-42ee2535228b","社论转述：“申请人问：‘材料如实提交，何罪之有？’审查组则认为，其中仍有隐瞒。”从这段文字能确定的是__1__。",9,"反问属于申请人的话，表达其否认有罪的立场；社论转述双方意见，没有表明自己支持哪一方。后句是审查组的质疑，也不表示申请人已接受指控。","发言人虽问“何错之有”，旁听者仍可举出反例；反问的力度不等于结论不可反驳。",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":10,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7eea-8b17-42ee247e78a5",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7e86-8b17-42ee22d8d1bc","社论用反问替申请人辩护，并反驳审查组对他的质疑",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7eaa-8b17-42ee23cb31a1","申请人用反问否认有罪，但这一立场受到审查组质疑",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7eca-8b17-42ee241a8be6","申请人向审查组询问罪名，并接受对方提出的隐瞒指控",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-da8b-7073-94e8-227782949948","编辑将通知中的“是以……然则……盖……”分别改为符合上下文的“因此……那么……这是因为……”，事实内容不变。对这次修改最准确的评价是__1__。",10,"题目限定替换符合上下文：“因此”仍标示因果，“那么”仍承接前提，“这是因为”仍引出原因。修改可减少仿古感，却没有把逻辑关系改成并列，也没有增加论证证据。","把面向新住户的通知中“是以暂不开放”改为“因此暂不开放”，可让表达更平实而不改变因果关系。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":10,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-da8b-703b-94e8-227781f50ad2",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7f6a-8b17-42ee257b8b7d","淡化了原有的因果，把推论改成了前后事件的并列",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8a-7f8a-8b17-42ee260827b7","增强了论证的依据，使原先的推论获得了证据支持",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8b-700b-94e8-2277811d7ad0","调整了表达的语体，保留了原有的因果与推论关系",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-da8b-7187-94e8-227784a53259","研究札记写道：“此信盖写于迁居之后。然则信中所说的‘旧邻’，或指原住处附近的人，仍须旁证。”摘要若保留两层判断的限度，应写成__1__。",11,"“盖”限制写信时间判断的确定性，“或”“仍须旁证”限制人物指称判断的确定性；“然则”承接前提继续推论，并未转折否定前说。不能把第一层推测当成定论。","笔记说“题名盖为后加”，若再据此讨论作品流传，就不能在摘要中把题名后加写成已经证实的事实。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":10,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-da8b-714f-94e8-22778405ba6c",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":16},"01a0e1ad-da8b-70c7-94e8-22778384d09b","写信或在迁居后，据此推测人物所指，两项判断均待旁证",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-da8b-710b-94e8-227783a5c0df","写信是在迁居后，据此推测人物所指，仅后一判断待旁证",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-da8b-712f-94e8-227783f5fd6d","写信或在迁居后，后文转而否定此说，时间判断须再查证","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_0db0b4ac-42de-4ef8-9eb1-469384b93f8e_hero.webp?v=1790492662",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"文言残留结构在现代文本中的理解","wenyan-canliu-jiegou-zai-xiandai-wenben-zhong-de-lijie","zh","C2"]