[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"grammar-exercise-01a0e1ad-de78-71fb-ae65-d777d5e521a0":3,"grammar-exercise-lesson-01a0e1ad-b7f2-71b6-8282-ad0b4f92013f":243},{"id":4,"grammarPage":5,"title":6,"instructions":7,"seoTitle":8,"seoDescription":9,"displayOrder":10,"type":11,"questions":12,"ogImageUrl":242},"01a0e1ad-de78-71fb-ae65-d777d5e521a0","\u002Fapi\u002Fgrammar_pages\u002F01a0e1ad-b7f2-71b6-8282-ad0b4f92013f","引述中的来源、声音与作者立场","根据给出的材料和写作要求，选择最准确的表述。注意来源、评价者与作者是否承担相同的断言责任。","引述中的声音与立场：来源和评价辨析练习","本组通过选词填空辨析引述中的声音、立场与责任归属，围绕新闻报道、机构回应和调查材料，练习判断来源链、引述动词、跨句评价与局部引号，区分来源表态和作者判断。结合具体上下文，辨别公开表态、辩护、事实接受与证据验证的不同作用，追踪多层转述及声音切换，避免把他人的保证当成已获证实的事实，也不把距离感误读为判假。",0,"word_select",[13,35,53,71,90,109,128,147,166,185,204,223],{"id":14,"sentenceTemplate":15,"displayOrder":10,"explanation":16,"exampleSentence":17,"blanks":18},"01a0e1ad-de78-75eb-ae65-d777d9071434","编辑要求只交代公司作过何种表态，不暗示该表态已经查实。原稿是：公司表示，新系统已通过全部测试。符合要求的改写是：__1__。","“表示”和“称”在这里都把内容归于公司。另两项加入了核实结论，使作者承担原材料没有提供的验证责任；归源本身仍要求公司确实作过该表态。","协会表示，报名人数已超过预期；记者尚未取得完整名单。",[19],{"id":20,"blankNumber":21,"options":22},"01a0e1ad-de78-755b-ae65-d777d8b2b5d9",1,[23,27,31],{"id":24,"optionText":25,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-7463-ae65-d777d5ffc348","新系统已通过全部测试，这一点已获证实",false,{"id":28,"optionText":29,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-74cb-ae65-d777d6def2e9","公司称，新系统已通过全部测试",true,{"id":32,"optionText":33,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7513-ae65-d777d7c128d2","经核实，公司的新系统已通过全部测试",2,{"id":36,"sentenceTemplate":37,"displayOrder":21,"explanation":38,"exampleSentence":39,"blanks":40},"01a0e1ad-de78-77d7-ae65-d777db373b56","报道写道：厂商声称，这种涂层可以使用十年，但目前尚无长期测试结果。仅据这句话，可以确定的是：__1__。","“声称”结合“尚无长期测试结果”表现出保留态度，但缺少验证不等于已经证伪，也不等于验证成功。","承包方声称工程符合标准，检测机构仍在复查。",[41],{"id":42,"blankNumber":21,"options":43},"01a0e1ad-de78-7763-ae65-d777da983f22",[44,47,50],{"id":45,"optionText":46,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-768b-ae65-d777d9a4c288","报道对厂商的说法保持距离，尚未判定其真假",{"id":48,"optionText":49,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-76d3-ae65-d777da084fd9","报道已判定厂商的说法为假",{"id":51,"optionText":52,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7717-ae65-d777da764981","报道已验证涂层确实可以使用十年",{"id":54,"sentenceTemplate":55,"displayOrder":34,"explanation":56,"exampleSentence":57,"blanks":58},"01a0e1ad-de78-79d7-ae65-d777de022ea7","材料只记录了协会在发布会上公开、郑重地宣布将全面改革评审制度，没有记录它受到质疑或接受不利事实。若要突出这次表态的公开郑重性质，应写：协会__1__，将全面改革评审制度。","题目要求突出公开、郑重的表态，“宣称”符合这一叙述重点。“辩称”引入受质疑后的辩护，“承认”引入接受事实的框架，材料均未提供。","候选人在集会上宣称，将把住房问题列为首要议题。",[59],{"id":60,"blankNumber":21,"options":61},"01a0e1ad-de78-795b-ae65-d777dd22beb0",[62,65,68],{"id":63,"optionText":64,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-7867-ae65-d777dc096681","辩称",{"id":66,"optionText":67,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-78df-ae65-d777dc121921","承认",{"id":69,"optionText":70,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7923-ae65-d777dc8ef209","宣称",{"id":72,"sentenceTemplate":73,"displayOrder":74,"explanation":75,"exampleSentence":76,"blanks":77},"01a0e1ad-de78-7bab-ae65-d777e169a22b","面对有关采购程序的质疑，主任辩称，紧急情况下可以简化审批。这里的“辩称”表明：__1__。",3,"前面的“面对……质疑”明确了辩护语境。“辩称”标记这种回应关系，不自动赋予理由虚假或已经核实的地位。","被问及延误原因时，运输方辩称道路临时封闭；这一解释还需核查。",[78],{"id":79,"blankNumber":21,"options":80},"01a0e1ad-de78-7b37-ae65-d777e15fa44a",[81,84,87],{"id":82,"optionText":83,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-7a63-ae65-d777dec2e88c","主任的理由已被作者认定为虚假",{"id":85,"optionText":86,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-7aa7-ae65-d777dfa5ae50","主任正在回应质疑，但这个动词本身不判定理由真假",{"id":88,"optionText":89,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7af3-ae65-d777e07bd086","主任的理由已由独立机构核实",{"id":91,"sentenceTemplate":92,"displayOrder":93,"explanation":94,"exampleSentence":95,"blanks":96},"01a0e1ad-de78-7dc7-ae65-d777e3829f71","同一人说出同一句话时，“他承认自己判断失误”与“他坦言自己判断失误”的叙述重点并不完全相同：前者通常突出__1__，后者突出表达的坦率。",4,"“承认”通常把内容呈现为说话者接受的事实，常带有终于接受的意味；“坦言”着重于表达态度。不能仅凭这些动词补写具体的先前否认过程。","她坦言自己仍然紧张；另一份记录则写明，她承认此前漏看了一页资料。",[97],{"id":98,"blankNumber":21,"options":99},"01a0e1ad-de78-7d37-ae65-d777e2f63e18",[100,103,106],{"id":101,"optionText":102,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-7c4f-ae65-d777e2023bfd","接受判断失误这一事实",{"id":104,"optionText":105,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-7ca7-ae65-d777e23251ac","公开郑重地发布未来计划",{"id":107,"optionText":108,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7cfb-ae65-d777e2cec707","对别人的指控作出否认",{"id":110,"sentenceTemplate":111,"displayOrder":112,"explanation":113,"exampleSentence":114,"blanks":115},"01a0e1ad-de79-701d-b4b2-3d5aec5896a5","一份报道先写“技术员表示，故障来自供电线路”，随后改成“检测结果证实，故障来自供电线路”。这次修改__1__。",5,"“表示”交代技术员的表态，“检测结果证实”则将故障原因呈现为经过验证。后者需要相应检测依据，不是单纯的措辞替换。","早先只有住户反映墙体渗水，后来现场检测证实防水层存在破损。",[116],{"id":117,"blankNumber":21,"options":118},"01a0e1ad-de78-7f47-ae65-d777e53aed35",[119,122,125],{"id":120,"optionText":121,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de78-7e73-ae65-d777e406319a","只更换了表达方式，没有改变证据责任",{"id":123,"optionText":124,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de78-7ebf-ae65-d777e4c6fc41","把已经验证的结论降为未经核查的猜测",{"id":126,"optionText":127,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de78-7f03-ae65-d777e4dc877f","把来源表态改成了呈现为已经验证的结论",{"id":129,"sentenceTemplate":130,"displayOrder":131,"explanation":132,"exampleSentence":133,"blanks":134},"01a0e1ad-de79-7209-b4b2-3d5aef1a8124","阅读：顾问表示，搬迁成本不会增加。按其说法，显然没有必要重新估算预算。第二句的评价__1__。",6,"“按其说法”是明确的来源延续标记，句号没有自动终止归源范围。“显然”本身也不能确定评价者。","教练认为赛程过密。该教练还表示，显然应当增加休息日。",[135],{"id":136,"blankNumber":21,"options":137},"01a0e1ad-de79-7195-b4b2-3d5aee69002b",[138,141,144],{"id":139,"optionText":140,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-70b5-b4b2-3d5aecd5ff63","因前面有句号而必然改归作者",{"id":142,"optionText":143,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-70f9-b4b2-3d5aece0290b","由“按其说法”继续归于顾问",{"id":145,"optionText":146,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-7141-b4b2-3d5aedb2300c","因出现“显然”而必然改归读者",{"id":148,"sentenceTemplate":149,"displayOrder":150,"explanation":151,"exampleSentence":152,"blanks":153},"01a0e1ad-de79-73f5-b4b2-3d5af0133051","阅读：馆长表示，新馆开放后客流将翻倍。本文认为，现有预约数据只能支持小幅增长的预测。第二句__1__。",7,"“本文认为”明确切换到作者声音，“现有预约数据”给出依据。作者对预测持不同看法，不等于否认馆长曾经作过表态。","企业预计销量迅速回升；现有材料只能说明订单暂时停止下滑。",[154],{"id":155,"blankNumber":21,"options":156},"01a0e1ad-de79-7385-b4b2-3d5aefc20786",[157,160,163],{"id":158,"optionText":159,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-7295-b4b2-3d5aef2533e5","切换到作者判断，并交代判断所依据的材料",{"id":161,"optionText":162,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-72dd-b4b2-3d5aef4173fd","继续转述馆长对客流翻倍的保证",{"id":164,"optionText":165,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-7321-b4b2-3d5aef5e3e4c","证明馆长从未作过客流翻倍的表态",{"id":167,"sentenceTemplate":168,"displayOrder":169,"explanation":170,"exampleSentence":171,"blanks":172},"01a0e1ad-de79-7519-b4b2-3d5af2bec322","材料写道：代表说，延期不会影响交付。显然，客户没有必要担心。没有其他上下文时，稳妥的分析是：__1__。",8,"第二句没有明确的来源延续或作者切换标记。句号和“显然”都不能单独解决声音归属，需要更多上下文或补充标记。","若写成“按该代表的判断，客户无需担心”，评价来源就清楚了。",[173],{"id":174,"blankNumber":21,"options":175},"01a0e1ad-de79-74b5-b4b2-3d5af25c2541",[176,179,182],{"id":177,"optionText":178,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-7449-b4b2-3d5af0ae37c9","句号足以证明第二句一定是作者自己的判断",{"id":180,"optionText":181,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-7471-b4b2-3d5af1a7fab4","“显然”足以证明第二句一定仍是代表的判断",{"id":183,"optionText":184,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-7495-b4b2-3d5af2409a57","仅凭句号和“显然”，不能确定第二句的评价者",{"id":186,"sentenceTemplate":187,"displayOrder":188,"explanation":189,"exampleSentence":190,"blanks":191},"01a0e1ad-de79-76e9-b4b2-3d5af4ea684d","作者只读到记者的报道：记者写道，经理转述了供应商关于下周到货的保证。忠实保留核查路径的写法是：__1__。",9,"作者掌握的是记者转述经理、经理再引供应商的来源链。正确项保留各层来源；另外两项虚构直接采访或核实，还把保证变成作者确认的事实。","据周刊报道，校方援引施工单位的说法，称操场月底可以使用。",[192],{"id":193,"blankNumber":21,"options":194},"01a0e1ad-de79-7671-b4b2-3d5af4104aaf",[195,198,201],{"id":196,"optionText":197,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-75ad-b4b2-3d5af3448da2","供应商在接受本文作者采访时保证下周到货",{"id":199,"optionText":200,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-75ed-b4b2-3d5af3780b75","据记者报道，经理称供应商保证下周到货",{"id":202,"optionText":203,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-762d-b4b2-3d5af3833a63","本文作者已向供应商核实，货物下周必到",{"id":205,"sentenceTemplate":206,"displayOrder":207,"explanation":208,"exampleSentence":209,"blanks":210},"01a0e1ad-de79-7921-b4b2-3d5af7d51dec","报道写道：该项目被主办方称为“绿色工程”。如果没有其他评价线索，这里的局部引号__1__。",10,"“被主办方称为”交代称谓来源，引号可用于保留原词。缺少后续评价时，不能只靠引号推定赞同或反讽。","展览方把这一区域命名为“未来客厅”，报道沿用了这个名称。",[211],{"id":212,"blankNumber":21,"options":213},"01a0e1ad-de79-7895-b4b2-3d5af6d5a27a",[214,217,220],{"id":215,"optionText":216,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-7791-b4b2-3d5af57ecb6c","可以标示主办方的原有称谓，不能单独证明作者赞同或反讽",{"id":218,"optionText":219,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-77e9-b4b2-3d5af5a35b16","必然证明作者赞同项目具有环保价值",{"id":221,"optionText":222,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-783d-b4b2-3d5af5fc0f24","必然证明作者认定项目不具备环保价值",{"id":224,"sentenceTemplate":225,"displayOrder":226,"explanation":227,"exampleSentence":228,"blanks":229},"01a0e1ad-de79-7aed-b4b2-3d5afaf3d6ef","评论写道：所谓“零风险投资”，其实连本金都没有保障。在这句话中，作者的疏离态度主要由__1__明确表达。",11,"“所谓”结合“连本金都没有保障”的反驳，明确否定“零风险”的评价。引号本身未必表达疏离，“投资”也不自带这一态度。","这项所谓的“便民措施”，反而让居民多跑了两趟。",[230],{"id":231,"blankNumber":21,"options":232},"01a0e1ad-de79-7a7d-b4b2-3d5afa179508",[233,236,239],{"id":234,"optionText":235,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":10},"01a0e1ad-de79-79ad-b4b2-3d5af8ab857e","局部引号这一种形式独自",{"id":237,"optionText":238,"isCorrect":26,"displayOrder":21},"01a0e1ad-de79-79f5-b4b2-3d5af9412f6f","“投资”这个名词本身",{"id":240,"optionText":241,"isCorrect":30,"displayOrder":34},"01a0e1ad-de79-7a39-b4b2-3d5af9e31c6b","“所谓”与后面否定保障的反驳共同","\u002Fuploads\u002Fimages\u002Fgpimg_974197a1-ca9b-4602-b55e-3a533b7df70b_hero.webp?v=1790492663",{"title":244,"slug":245,"language":246,"level":247},"引述中的声音、立场与责任归属","yinshu-zhong-de-shengyin-lichang-yu-zeren-guishu","zh","C2"]